procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Better way of counting characters?

1997-08-26 13:32:35
era eriksson writes on 26 August 1997 at 12:08:40
[...]
use something like "me@" <me(_at_)my(_dot_)address(_dot_)net> (@comment) just 
to see if
they can break things but they probably shouldn't count on their mail
getting through all of the time then :-)
 If you really want to follow the rules, RFC822 will prove to be good
reading. A lot of odd characters are allowed if you just quote them or

Note that the draft son-of-RFC822 (http://www.ietf.org) is explicitly
disallowing many of these rather arcane formats.  For example,
   "J. Daniel Smith" <DanS(_at_)bristol(_dot_)com>
is the sanctioned email address format in this draft instead of
"overloading" the comment as in
   DanS(_at_)bristol(_dot_)com (J. Daniel Smith)

   Dan
------------------- message is author's opinion only ------------------
J. Daniel Smith <DanS(_at_)bristol(_dot_)com>        
http://www.bristol.com/~DanS
Bristol Technology B.V.                   +31 33 450 50 50, ...51 (FAX)
Amersfoort, The Netherlands               {info,jobs}(_at_)bristol(_dot_)com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>