At 10:25 PM 9/8/97 -0400, Timothy J Luoma wrote thusly:
I've gotten THREE of these. Anyone care to try and guess who on the list
can't be reached?
[snip]
Return-Path: <luomat+procmail(_at_)luomat(_dot_)peak(_dot_)org>
Received: (qmail 985 invoked from network); 8 Sep 1997 22:35:39 -0000
Received: from localhost (budney(_at_)127(_dot_)0(_dot_)0(_dot_)1)
by localhost with SMTP; 8 Sep 1997 22:35:39 -0000
X-POP3-Rcpt: budney(_at_)scosysv
Return-Path: procmail-request(_at_)Informatik(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
Received: from internal.daxus.com (inside.daxus.com [10.1.1.200]) by
scosysv.daxus.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA02539 for
<budney(_at_)daxus(_dot_)com>;
Fri, 5 Sep 1997 18:28:50 -0400
I'd wager lunch on the above address: budney(_at_)daxus(_dot_)com
This is of course further backed up by the fact that daxus.com is the
origin of the error message you were sent, and budney appears in several
other places in the message.
Also, note that the headers are screwed up - there are two return-paths
listed - the one from the list, and the other (and a few additional
headers) apparently added by the person's local mailer agent.
Looks like the fellow has some address translation in effect, and the
delivery tables are goofed?
---
Please DO NOT carbon me on list replies. I'll get my copy from the list.
Sean B. Straw / Professional Software Engineering
Post Box 2395 / San Rafael, CA 94912-2395