procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: whitelisting bad?

1997-09-30 20:25:44
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

=== Nothing above this line is part of the message. ===

Timothy J Luoma <luomat(_at_)peak(_dot_)org> wrote:
:b) if I send you mail which you reject, don't expect I'll resend it.

spamgard(tm) is used with the hope, but not the expectation, that the
mail will be resent.

:                                                                      Hope
:you didn't need the info included.

That's the risk I take, of course.  If I'm happy to risk not receiving
the info, and you're happy not to resend it, then everybody wins.

Unfortunately for you, Timothy, you're already on my whitelist.  Sue
me.  :)

Signatures Follow. (tm)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBNDG4tu7FqQNEGv6lAQH+KQP/W0+3SVIHYmgHK7x/7JA50csstCe7H7GJ
idtzzlxEQzrtROm7B+4v17Hg8ENypH+gWfTN7La5of7cQgBHfYJTJYbWmdBFsPfi
sASQ1E6IPcKCS+vhbaD+0Z86/nGnwPhDGbFq9Dn+sUim12wE+h0VNHct6nscS0L9
9ZAW/PM6WkU=
=7/61
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- It is now safe to turn off your computer.
Bill Evans/Box 4829/Irvine, California 92616/(714)551-2766  _   /| ACK!
Email-To: wje(_at_)acm(_dot_)org  -- PGP encrypted mail preferred. --  \`o_O' /
   Finger wje(_at_)netcom(_dot_)com for public key.   Key #: 441AFEA5   =( )=
PGPprint: FB D0 1C 1D EF DC 26 BA  B3 9E 84 0B 40 D6 59 9C     U

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: whitelisting bad?, Timothy J Luoma
    • Re: whitelisting bad?, William J. Evans; mail protected by spamgard{tm} <=