Procmail (date)
October 31, 1997
- Re: how to keep symlinked mailbox from getting nuked?, Philip Guenther, 15:08
- Re: multiple logs?, David W. Tamkin, 15:03
- Re: multiple logs?, era eriksson, 14:53
- multiple logs?, Justin Lloyd, 14:25
- Re: how to keep symlinked mailbox from getting nuked?, Charles Hines, 12:59
- Re: Program hangs in .procmail: what to do?, Philip Guenther, 12:19
- Program hangs in .procmail: what to do?, jari.aalto, 11:08
- Re: how to keep symlinked mailbox from getting nuked?, Philip Guenther, 10:51
- how to keep symlinked mailbox from getting nuked?, Charles Hines, 09:05
- Re: Please help -- couple of questions, Philip Guenther, 08:24
October 30, 1997
- spambouncer CC, Christophe Zwecker, 23:33
- Re: Please help -- couple of questions, Ricardo Kleemann, 23:02
- Re: Please help -- couple of questions, Philip Guenther, 22:26
- Please help -- couple of questions, Ricardo Kleemann, 20:43
- Re: Oops: False Positive on Comments: Authenticated ..., Felix Tilley, 20:12
- Re: Restricting length of MATCH?, Rik Kabel, 15:35
- procmail test, ljiljancic, 15:32
- Re: Restricting length of MATCH?, David W. Tamkin, 14:46
- Re: Restricting length of MATCH?, James Waldby, 14:20
- Re: number of preceding messages, David W. Tamkin, 13:50
- Getting started, taking a long time, Andrew Vardy, 11:53
- helpo?, Joseph P. Wetstein, 11:36
- Re: Restricting length of MATCH?, David W. Tamkin, 10:26
- Mike's Unix Tools and Techniques: send-fil, Christophe Zwecker, 02:25
- dump mime attch. to disk, Christophe Zwecker, 02:24
- Restricting length of MATCH?, era eriksson, 01:40
October 29, 1997
- Re: Best anti-spam-filter tests?, Felix Tilley, 20:31
- Re: Trouble with $SPACETAB, Lars Kellogg-Stedman, 12:12
- Re: Trouble with $SPACETAB, Philip Guenther, 11:48
- Re: Trouble with $SPACETAB, David W. Tamkin, 10:57
- Re: Best anti-spam-filter tests?, Eli the Bearded, 09:52
- Trouble with $SPACETAB, Ed James, 08:54
October 28, 1997
- Re: Oops: False Positive on Comments: Authenticated ..., gsutter, 23:29
- Re: Oops: False Positive on Comments: Authenticated ..., Matt Korth, 22:26
- problems with procmail, Katam Tjokromulia, 20:45
- Re: Oops: False Positive on Comments: Authenticated ..., Timothy J Luoma, 20:33
- Oops: False Positive on Comments: Authenticated ..., Felix Tilley, 20:05
- Re: Best anti-spam-filter tests?, Timothy J Luoma, 18:10
- Re: It's the dish, not the culture., Timothy J Luoma, 17:56
- modifying mail list by list, David W. Tamkin, 17:47
- Re: Modifying message body via procmail, David W. Tamkin, 17:35
- Re: How come procmail doesn't know \t code?, jari.aalto, 17:25
- RE: Modifying message body via procmail, Walter Dnes, 16:10
- RE: It's the dish, not the culture., Walter Dnes, 16:09
- Re: Best anti-spam-filter tests?, Matthew G. Saroff (Reply to the pobox address), 14:49
- Re: Best anti-spam-filter tests?, John Gianni, 13:29
- Best anti-spam-filter tests?, John Gianni, 12:38
- Re: How come procmail doesn't know \t code?, David W. Tamkin, 09:53
- Re: Forwarding messages and saving them on a POP account, David W. Tamkin, 09:47
- Re: Forwarding messages and saving them on a POP account, SHY GUY, 09:27
- Forwarding messages to two addresses, Islanders E-mail List, 08:36
- Forwarding messages and saving them on a POP account, Islanders E-mail List, 08:26
- Re: Duplicate message handling filter, era eriksson, 07:30
- How come procmail doesn't know \t code?, jari.aalto, 07:27
- Re: It's the dish, not the culture., Stan Ryckman, 07:01
- Re: Duplicate message handling filter, W. Wesley Groleau x4923, 06:28
- Re: duplicate message-id filter isn't working for me (procmail 3.11pre7), era eriksson, 04:14
- Re: duplicate message-id filter isn't working for me (procmail 3.11pre7), jari.aalto, 03:38
- Re: Modifying message body via procmail, jari.aalto, 02:50
- Re: It's the dish, not the culture., era eriksson, 01:24
October 27, 1997
- Re: Which is better?, William J. Evans; mail protected by spamgard{tm}, 22:40
- Re: Which is better?, Felix Tilley, 21:05
- Re: Duplicate message handling filter, Jason Tyler, 16:23
- Re: It's the dish, not the culture., David W. Tamkin, 13:19
- Re: duplicate detection with MD5, W. Wesley Groleau x4923, 13:05
- Re: On discouraging direct replies, Alan K. Stebbens, 12:12
- Re: duplicate message-id filter isn't working for me (procmail 3.11pre7), Lars Kellogg-Stedman, 10:26
- Re: It's the dish, not the culture., Karl E. Vogel, 09:57
- Re: Modifying message body via procmail, era eriksson, 09:15
- Re: It's the dish, not the culture., era eriksson, 09:00
- Re: You're a winner, W. Wesley Groleau x4923, 08:37
- Re: Modifying message body via procmail, David W. Tamkin, 08:22
- Re: Env Var expansion in procmail filters?, David W. Tamkin, 08:00
- automated Reply-To: insertion, David W. Tamkin, 07:53
- duplicate message-id filter isn't working for me (procmail 3.11pre7), Alan J. Flavell, 06:39
- subscribe, Kathy Burns, 06:37
- Re: On discouraging direct replies, jari.aalto, 02:53
October 26, 1997
- Modifying message body via procmail, Walter Dnes, 23:26
- Env Var expansion in procmail filters?, Walter Dnes, 23:26
- Duplicate message handling filter, Ravi C. Kumar, 23:08
- Re: Personal Replies Solution, Ken Hooper, 22:35
- things that insert custom headers, David W. Tamkin, 22:07
- Re: Personal Replies Solution, Michael Stone, 21:23
- Re: It's the dish, not the culture., Donald E. Hammond, 18:24
- Thank you.., Omer Music, 17:19
- Re: It's the dish, not the culture., David W. Tamkin, 15:17
- Re: FAQ: Unsubscribe instructions and some useful links, era eriksson, 14:42
- FAQ: Unsubscribe instructions and some useful links, era eriksson, 14:29
- Re: It's the dish, not the culture., era eriksson, 13:39
- Thank you and last question, Stephan Witoszynskyj, 13:31
- It's the dish, not the culture., David W. Tamkin, 12:54
- embedding newlines in procmail actions, David W. Tamkin, 09:12
- Re: executing line by line through a message, era eriksson, 04:18
- Re: On discouraging direct replies, era eriksson, 03:50
October 25, 1997
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, Mike A. Harris, 19:50
- procmail's regexp quirks, David W. Tamkin, 19:40
- Re: Spammer-slammer algorithm, David W. Tamkin, 19:32
- Re: Personal Replies Solution, David W. Tamkin, 19:25
- Re: OOPS!, William J. Evans; mail protected by spamgard{tm}, 19:06
- Re: On discouraging direct replies, Timothy J Luoma, 18:09
- Re: Personal Replies Solution, Timothy J Luoma, 18:01
- Re: executing line by line through a message, David W. Tamkin, 17:15
- On discouraging direct replies, Alan K. Stebbens, 16:55
- Re: Returning temporary failures, David W. Tamkin, 16:52
- OOPS!, Walter Dnes, 16:37
- Re: problem counting lines of text, David W. Tamkin, 16:27
- Re: Auto-Reply question, David W. Tamkin, 16:17
- Re: Personal Replies Solution, David W. Tamkin, 16:11
- RE: Mailin list with procmail.., Walter Dnes, 12:27
- Mailin list with procmail.., Omer Music, 10:37
- Re: Spammer-slammer algorithm, Chris Bidmead, 09:55
- Re: Mastering Regular Expressions, era eriksson, 07:37
- Mastering Regular Expressions, Paul Dunne, 07:13
- Re: Spammer-slammer algorithm, Andrew, 06:59
- RE: Spammer-slammer algorithm, Andrew, 06:57
- Re: Spammer-slammer algorithm, era eriksson, 05:52
- Re: How to code a simple "if ... then ... endif" in "procmailrc", era eriksson, 05:31
- Re: Emacs and Linting procmail code with tinypm.el v1.21, era eriksson, 05:08
- Re: "Kernel-unlock failed" - possible mail loss issue?, era eriksson, 05:05
- Re: executing line by line through a message, era eriksson, 04:53
October 24, 1997
- RE: Spammer-slammer algorithm, Walter Dnes, 22:57
- RE: Spammer-slammer algorithm, Walter Dnes, 22:57
- Re: Which is better?, Timothy J Luoma, 19:02
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, Mike A. Harris, 18:39
- Re: Which is better?, Jason Marshall, 18:20
- Re: Personal Replies (Re: Spammer-slammer algorithm), Timothy J Luoma, 18:06
- Re: executing line by line through a message, Matthew G. Saroff, 17:40
- Re: Personal Replies (Re: Spammer-slammer algorithm), Chuq Von Rospach, 15:31
- Re: Personal Replies (Re: Spammer-slammer algorithm), Timothy J Luoma, 13:32
- Re: Personal Replies (Re: Spammer-slammer algorithm), Chuq Von Rospach, 12:56
- Re: Returning temporary failures, Aaron Schrab, 12:51
- Re: Personal Replies, Timothy J Luoma, 12:21
- Re: problem counting lines of text, Adam Grove, 12:17
- Re: problem counting lines of text, David W. Tamkin, 11:34
- Re: Returning temporary failures, David W. Tamkin, 11:07
- Re: Personal Replies, David W. Tamkin, 10:50
- problem counting lines of text, Adam Grove, 10:32
- Re: executing line by line through a message, David W. Tamkin, 10:19
- Re: "Kernel-unlock failed" - possible mail loss issue?, Nelson Minar, 10:15
- Re: Auto-Reply question, Charles Gagnon, 08:21
- Re: Auto-Reply question, Timothy J Luoma, 07:27
- Auto-Reply question, Charles Gagnon, 06:52
- How to code a simple "if ... then ... endif" in "procmailrc", Dr. Rainer Woitok, 01:25
- Re: executing line by line through a message, jari.aalto, 01:22
- Re: executing line by line through a message, J. Daniel Smith, 01:14
- Re: Emacs and Linting procmail code with tinypm.el v1.21, J. Daniel Smith, 01:06
October 23, 1997
- Re: "Kernel-unlock failed" - possible mail loss issue?, Philip Guenther, 22:27
- RE: Spammer-slammer algorithm, Andrew, 20:48
- Personal Replies (Re: Spammer-slammer algorithm), Timothy J Luoma, 19:59
- Re: Spammer-slammer algorithm, Rik Kabel, 19:29
- Re: Anti-mailbomb, Ralph Henderson, 18:40
- Anti-mailbomb, Mark Dappollone, 17:22
- RE: Spammer-slammer algorithm, Walter Dnes, 15:57
- Re: Warning -- new, noxious spam message., Timothy J Luoma, 15:43
- Re: executing line by line through a message, era eriksson, 15:31
- "Kernel-unlock failed" - possible mail loss issue?, Nelson Minar, 15:28
- executing line by line through a message, Matthew G. Saroff (Reply to the pobox address), 15:03
- Re: Fake From line detection, Mike Spengler, 14:46
- Returning temporary failures, Aaron Schrab, 14:30
- Re: Warning -- new, noxious spam message., Chuq Von Rospach, 14:29
- mail2news recipe?, Robert Nicholson, 12:39
- Re: Spammer-slammer algorithm, Rik Kabel, 12:27
- Re: Emacs and Linting procmail code with tinypm.el v1.21, jari.aalto, 11:35
- Re: Emacs and Linting procmail code with tinypm.el v1.21, jari.aalto, 11:23
- Re: Emacs and Linting procmail code with tinypm.el v1.21, era eriksson, 11:09
- Re: Emacs and Linting procmail code with tinypm.el v1.21, era eriksson, 11:07
- Re: Emacs and Linting procmail code with tinypm.el v1.21, jari.aalto, 10:47
- Re: Emacs and Linting procmail code with tinypm.el v1.21, era eriksson, 10:40
- Re: Emacs and Linting procmail code with tinypm.el v1.21, jari.aalto, 10:18
- Re: Emacs and Linting procmail code with tinypm.el v1.21, jari.aalto, 10:04
- Re: Fake From line detection, Philip Guenther, 09:46
- Help w/POP, Luigi P. Bai, 09:11
- Re: Fake From line detection, Mike Spengler, 09:04
- Re: Emacs and Linting procmail code with tinypm.el v1.21, Philip Guenther, 08:22
- Re: avoiding duplicates from separate mailing lists?, era eriksson, 08:00
- Re: Emacs and Linting procmail code with tinypm.el v1.21, era eriksson, 07:57
- Re: Warning -- new, noxious spam message., Banks B J, 07:53
- Re: Warning -- new, noxious spam message., W. Wesley Groleau x4923, 07:06
- Emacs and Linting procmail code with tinypm.el v1.21, jari.aalto, 05:42
- Re: avoiding duplicates from separate mailing lists?, Justin Lloyd, 05:35
- Re: Spammer-slammer algorithm, Chris Bidmead, 02:05
- Re: avoiding duplicates from separate mailing lists?, era eriksson, 01:13
- Re: Spammer-slammer algorithm, era eriksson, 01:01
- Re: GNU sed version 2.05 is broken?, Chris Bidmead, 00:50
October 22, 1997
- Re: Spammer-slammer algorithm, Professional Software Engineering, 22:10
- Re: Warning -- new, noxious spam message., Michael Stone, 18:17
- Re: GNU sed version 2.05 is broken?, Philip Guenther, 17:42
- Re: Spammer-slammer algorithm, Andrew, 17:10
- Re: Fake From line detection, Philip Guenther, 16:54
- Re: GNU sed version 2.05 is broken?, Chris Bidmead, 16:24
- avoiding duplicates from separate mailing lists?, Justin Lloyd, 16:15
- Spammer-slammer algorithm, Walter Dnes, 15:32
- Re: Warning -- new, noxious spam message., murr rhame, 15:09
- Re: Fake From line detection, Mike Spengler, 14:47
- Warning -- new, noxious spam message., Chuq Von Rospach, 14:39
- Re: Fake From line detection, Philip Guenther, 14:13
- Filtering old mail messages, Joe DeBattista, 14:10
- Re: Procmail and Netscape - locking & filtering, David W. Tamkin, 13:09
- Fake From line detection, Mike Spengler, 12:25
- Re: Need Help, era eriksson, 12:03
- Procmail and Netscape - locking & filtering, Mike de Laine, 10:21
- Need Help, Sun Shengqiang, 07:58
- Re: Which is better?, J. Daniel Smith, 07:22
- Re: Which is better?, David W. Tamkin, 06:23
- Re: How to deal with multiple From: ?, J. Daniel Smith, 00:52
October 21, 1997
- Which is better?, Jason Marshall, 22:24
- Re: broken message IDs, Eli the Bearded, 16:03
- How to deal with multiple From: ?, kaihua chen, 15:59
- Re: Variable Use, David W. Tamkin, 12:37
- Variable Use, Fritz W Feuerbacher, 12:28
- new NICE forward, Timothy J Luoma, 09:09
- Re: broken message IDs, W. Wesley Groleau x4923, 08:58
- Questions about Linting rules, jari.aalto, 02:51
- Re: Autoresponder for a domain., era eriksson, 01:27
- Re: The 'W' flag and its usage [philip Guenther], jari.aalto, 01:20
- Autoresponder for a domain., Marco Pirovano, 01:03
- Re: log -off ?, era eriksson, 01:02
- Useless Use Of Meow (was: Announce: Emacs and Procmail minor mode available), era eriksson, 01:01
- Re: log -off ?, era eriksson, 00:15
- Re: why did this match?, era eriksson, 00:06
October 20, 1997
- Re: Hello, Petr Brehovsky, 23:12
- Re: why did this match?, Philip Guenther, 17:02
- leading newlines in $MATCH, David W. Tamkin, 16:01
- Re: log -off ?, Timothy J Luoma, 15:22
- Re: why did this match?, Timothy J Luoma, 15:20
- Hello, startyour, 15:13
- Re: line-by-line processing (was: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments), Edward J. Sabol, 14:39
- log -off ?, { brad brace }, 13:48
- Re: The 'W' flag and its usage [philip Guenther], Philip Guenther, 13:47
- Re: line-by-line processing (was: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments), Philip Guenther, 13:43
- Re: Problems with (Returned mail: Data format error), Matthew G. Saroff (Reply to the pobox address), 13:06
- broken message IDs, Eli the Bearded, 13:02
- The 'W' flag and its usage [philip Guenther], jari.aalto, 11:41
- Re: why did this match?, Philip Guenther, 11:34
- Re: regex double checking, David W. Tamkin, 10:49
- Re: regex double checking, Philip Guenther, 10:08
- Re: procmail: Skipped "E", Philip Guenther, 10:02
- Re: Problems with (Returned mail: Data format error), Philip Guenther, 09:45
- Announce: Emacs and Procmail minor mode available, jari.aalto, 09:36
- Re: line-by-line processing (was: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments), Edward J. Sabol, 09:06
- Re: why did this match?, Timothy J Luoma, 08:58
- Re: regex double checking, Timothy J Luoma, 08:57
- Re: procmail: Skipped "E", Timothy J Luoma, 08:48
- procmail: Skipped "E", { brad brace }, 08:22
- Re: why did this match?, David W. Tamkin, 08:21
- Re: regex double checking, Philip Guenther, 08:04
- Problems with (Returned mail: Data format error), Matthew G. Saroff, 06:05
- Re: mail lost?, era eriksson, 05:46
- Re: mail lost?, Christoph Kukulies, 05:30
- Allowable size of output from backticks (was Re: Multiple address delimiter), era eriksson, 03:05
- Re: Multiple address delimiter, J. Daniel Smith, 03:05
- Re: regex double checking, era eriksson, 01:22
- Re: why did this match?, era eriksson, 01:15
- Re: Multiple address delimiter, era eriksson, 01:13
- Re: mail lost?, era eriksson, 01:12
- mail lost?, Christoph Kukulies, 00:39
October 19, 1997
- Re: regex double checking, Timothy J Luoma, 23:45
- Re: Multiple address delimiter, Timothy J Luoma, 21:55
- regex double checking, Timothy J Luoma, 21:49
- Multiple address delimiter, Ralph Henderson, 21:30
- why did this match?, Timothy J Luoma, 20:00
- Re: GNU sed version 2.05 is broken?, Lars Hecking, 12:12
- Re: make install problem, Philip Guenther, 12:07
- make install problem, Z. Hu, 10:08
- Re: GNU sed version 2.05 is broken?, Michael Stone, 10:05
- Spam Fans UNITE!, Chris Bidmead, 05:49
- Re: GNU sed version 2.05 is broken?, Chris Bidmead, 05:43
- TAke me off the mailing listRe: New mail with procmail, labruche, 05:18
October 18, 1997
- Re: New mail with procmail, Ray, 08:48
- line-by-line processing (was: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments), J. Daniel Smith, 06:50
- Re: procmail v3.11pre7 - File locking problem under IRIX 6.2, Rick Troxel, 06:30
- Re: Please write a procmail book, William J. Evans; mail protected by spamgard{tm}, 03:41
- Re: New mail with procmail, era eriksson, 03:02
- New mail with procmail, Malcolm Florence, 02:32
- Procmail FAQ and Links pointer (pre-faq or pre-inf), era eriksson, 02:27
October 17, 1997
- Re: help, Philip Guenther, 22:49
- Re: GNU sed version 2.05 is broken?, William J. Evans; mail protected by spamgard{tm}, 18:34
- Re: timestamp spam filter, Edward J. Sabol, 13:03
- Re: More about problems with large email?, Philip Guenther, 12:48
- Re: procmail v3.11pre7 - File locking problem under IRIX 6.2, Philip Guenther, 12:40
- Re: GNU sed version 2.05 is broken?, Peter S Galbraith, 12:23
- whether a variable is set, David W. Tamkin, 12:10
- help, Edward T. King, 12:03
- GNU sed version 2.05 is broken?, Chris Bidmead, 11:21
- procmail v3.11pre7 - File locking problem under IRIX 6.2, Steve Kelley, 10:29
- Re: About mails not addressed to me personally, Kimmo Jaskari, 10:22
- timestamp spam filter, { brad brace }, 10:13
- Re: About mails not addressed to me personally, era eriksson, 09:58
- About mails not addressed to me personally, Kimmo Jaskari, 09:10
- Re: Please write a procmail book, Nancy McGough, 09:00
- AIX, DFS, Pine, imapd, procmail, nulls and locking, Mark Plaksin, 09:00
- Processing of `From ' lines with -ds options in formail ?, Ronald Florence, 08:47
- Re: quick question, era eriksson, 07:13
- quick question, _Clint_, 06:47
October 16, 1997
- Re: Unrecgonized options: "Y", Philip Guenther, 20:00
- Re: where is rfc that defines signature separator "-- \n"?, Ed McGuire, 18:08
- Unrecgonized options: "Y", Douglas Semonche, 17:19
- Re: where is rfc that defines signature separator "-- \n"?, Michael Stone, 14:45
- Re: where is rfc that defines signature separator "-- \n"?, Jeffrey L. Nauss, 14:20
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, Edward J. Sabol, 14:04
- Re: where is rfc that defines signature separator "-- \n"?, Ed McGuire, 13:40
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, J. Daniel Smith, 12:47
- Re: Sending notification of new mail, David W. Tamkin, 12:33
- Re: where is rfc that defines signature separator "-- \n"?, jari.aalto, 12:31
- Re: Installing procmail, Philip Guenther, 12:09
- Sending notification of new mail, Peter S Galbraith, 11:26
- lopping off signatures, David W. Tamkin, 11:03
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, J. Daniel Smith, 10:58
- preparing $VAR for use by sed, David W. Tamkin, 10:45
- Re: rm a non-existent file, David W. Tamkin, 10:44
- Re: Installing procmail, era eriksson, 10:10
- More about problems with large email?, Mike Frisch, 10:02
- Re: Installing procmail, Jordi Garcia Busquets, 09:43
- Re: Procmail question (Please email me direct), Professional Software Engineering, 09:35
- Re: Please write a procmail book, era eriksson, 09:19
- Re: where is rfc that defines signature separator "-- \n"?, Harley A. Stenzel, 08:59
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, Edward J. Sabol, 08:54
- Re: Two procmail/formail questions, era eriksson, 08:40
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, era eriksson, 07:59
- where is rfc that defines signature separator "-- \n"?, jari.aalto, 07:06
- Re: Please write a procmail book, William J. Evans; mail protected by spamgard{tm}, 06:04
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, J. Daniel Smith, 06:00
- Re: Two procmail/formail questions, jari.aalto, 04:41
- RE: rm a non-existent file: Thx, Ralph Henderson, 02:47
- Re: Please write a procmail book, J. Daniel Smith, 01:09
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, era eriksson, 01:05
- Re: Procmail question (Please email me direct), era eriksson, 01:00
- Re: rm a non-existent file, era eriksson, 00:04
October 15, 1997
- Re: Variable as action line?, era eriksson, 23:59
- Re: Two procmail/formail questions, era eriksson, 23:57
- Re: Installing procmail, era eriksson, 23:44
- Re: Please write a procmail book, John Jensen, 23:29
- rm a non-existent file, Ralph Henderson, 22:13
- Re: How do I get off this list?, Felix Tilley, 21:00
- Variable as action line?, Gregory Sutter, 19:22
- Two procmail/formail questions, Dan Hersam, 19:16
- Re: Procmail question (Please email me direct), Professional Software Engineering, 18:02
- Procmail question (Please email me direct), Fireball, 16:30
- Re: formail -rt bug in 3.11pre7 ???, David W. Tamkin, 14:22
- Re: formail -rt bug in 3.11pre7 ???, jari.aalto, 13:26
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, David W. Tamkin, 13:14
- Re: formail -rt bug in 3.11pre7 ???, Edward J. Sabol, 13:13
- Re: Installing procmail, Harley A. Stenzel, 13:06
- Re: formail -rt bug in 3.11pre7 ???, jari.aalto, 13:05
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, J. Daniel Smith, 12:47
- Re: formail -rt bug in 3.11pre7 ???, jari.aalto, 12:20
- Installing procmail, Jordi Garcia Busquets, 11:30
- Re: formail -rt bug in 3.11pre7 ???, Edward J. Sabol, 11:17
- Re: Forward Blindly..., Philip Guenther, 11:07
- Re: formail -rt bug in 3.11pre7 ???, Philip Guenther, 11:00
- Please write a procmail book, John Jensen, 09:40
- running out of processes (sendmail and/or procmail question), Timothy J Luoma, 09:26
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, David W. Tamkin, 08:57
- formail -rt bug in 3.11pre7 ???, jari.aalto, 08:26
- Forward Blindly..., Liston Bias, 07:25
- interNIC in spamfolder, Tomas Karlsson, 06:04
- Sorry about the outburst, Kimmo Jaskari, 05:31
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, J. Daniel Smith, 02:49
- Re: User Interface into Procmail..., J. Daniel Smith, 01:14
October 14, 1997
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, era eriksson, 22:59
- Re: Difference between `CAT file` and VAR=|cat file ?, era eriksson, 22:57
- Re: .forward and parameter passing (solved), David W. Tamkin, 16:31
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, Mike A. Harris, 16:17
- Re: Spambouncer, Timothy J Luoma, 16:17
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, Mike A. Harris, 16:16
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, Mike A. Harris, 16:16
- Re: .forward and parameter passing (solved), Rik Kabel, 15:16
- Re: .forward and parameter passing, David W. Tamkin, 13:49
- Re: unsub in footer (was Re: Spambouncer), jari.aalto, 13:43
- Re: Procmail with huge messages (was Re: Can there be rules that only parse the headers?), Andre Albsmeier, 13:43
- Re: Spambouncer, era eriksson, 13:11
- Re: .forward and parameter passing, era eriksson, 13:08
- Re: Difference between `CAT file` and VAR=|cat file ?, era eriksson, 12:48
- FAQ frequency revisited (was Re: Spambouncer), era eriksson, 12:45
- Re: Spambouncer, jari.aalto, 12:27
- Re: .forward and parameter passing, W. Wesley Groleau x4923, 12:24
- Re: User Interface into Procmail..., J. Mates, 12:00
- Re: Spambouncer, Lars Hecking, 11:44
- Re: .forward and parameter passing, David W. Tamkin, 11:36
- Re: Spambouncer, W. Wesley Groleau x4923, 11:34
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, Mike A. Harris, 11:02
- Re: Spambouncer, W. Wesley Groleau x4923, 10:24
- Re: Spambouncer, Professional Software Engineering, 10:24
- Re: User Interface into Procmail..., Marc Fournier, 10:21
- Re: unsub in footer (was Re: Spambouncer), Timothy J Luoma, 10:19
- Difference between `CAT file` and VAR=|cat file ?, jari.aalto, 10:12
- Re: Procmail with huge messages (was Re: Can there be rules that only parse the headers?), Timothy J Luoma, 09:50
- Re: How do I get off this list?, Timothy J Luoma, 09:42
- Re: User Interface into Procmail..., jari.aalto, 09:28
- Re: Spambouncer, Bill Moseley, 08:59
- Need Help, james, 08:46
- Re: Have procmail continue to parse a message after a condition is met., W. Wesley Groleau x4923, 08:05
- Re: User Interface into Procmail..., era eriksson, 06:50
- Spambouncer: bigfoot mail storm, Tim Chambers, 06:33
- unsubscribe, Charles Pitre, 05:40
- User Interface into Procmail..., Marc Fournier, 05:19
- Re: Editing splite.rc, james, 04:22
- Re: Antspam: how to detect same To and From fields?, era eriksson, 03:10
- Editing splite.rc, james, 03:04
- Antspam: how to detect same To and From fields?, Ulli Horlacher, 02:32
- Re: Stripping HTML: Another Question, jari.aalto, 01:43
October 13, 1997
- Re: What is the WHOTO var?, Philip Guenther, 22:08
- Re: What is the WHOTO var?, david hunt, 20:15
- Re: Cloning within a LOCKFILE block, Bill Moseley, 18:52
- Re: What is the WHOTO var?, Philip Guenther, 17:11
- Re: Cloning within a LOCKFILE block, Philip Guenther, 16:56
- Re: Can there be rules that only parse the headers?, Philip Guenther, 16:43
- Re: How do I get off this list?, Ralph Sims, 16:12
- Re: How do I get off this list?, Professional Software Engineering, 16:06
- Re: How do I get off this list?, Kimmo Jaskari, 15:09
- .forward and parameter passing, Rik Kabel, 15:05
- Re: How do I get off this list?, Aaron Schrab, 15:03
- Re: How do I get off this list?, Thomas Earl!, 14:27
- Re: logfile questions, Philip Guenther, 14:21
- daemon exception, Kevin E. Davis, 13:05
- apology, Kevin E. Davis, 12:54
- Re: Can there be rules that only parse the headers?, Jason Haar, 12:52
- Re: Can there be rules that only parse the headers?, Jason Haar, 12:43
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, jari.aalto, 12:10
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, Rob Vandeweyer, 11:20
- Re: Stripping HTML: Another Question, _Clint_, 10:22
- Re: identical From and To headers, Professional Software Engineering, 10:22
- Re: Cloning within a LOCKFILE block, Bill Moseley, 10:21
- Re: How do I get off this list?, Hang Xu, 10:20
- Re: logfile questions, era eriksson, 10:14
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, Michael Stone, 09:49
- Re: identical From and To headers, era eriksson, 09:34
- logfile questions, Chuck Campbell, 09:32
- identical From and To headers, { brad brace }, 08:58
- How do I get off this list?, VisualNet Support, 07:46
- Re: Can there be rules that only parse the headers?, James L. McGill, 07:41
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, era eriksson, 06:21
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, Jari Aalto, 02:49
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, J. Daniel Smith, 01:41
October 12, 1997
- Procmail with huge messages (was Re: Can there be rules that only parse the headers?), era eriksson, 23:15
- Re: Can there be rules that only parse the headers?, Philip Guenther, 21:08
- help, Schramm, Rich, 19:38
- Procmail as an auto-responder, Allan Simmons, 18:25
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, Michael Stone, 18:04
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, Jari Aalto, 15:16
- Can there be rules that only parse the headers?, Jason Haar, 13:16
- Re: Cloning within a LOCKFILE block, David W. Tamkin, 10:47
- Re: date parsing (was: Incrementing a counter), David W. Tamkin, 10:39
- Serving multiple files, Bill Moseley, 09:58
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, J. Daniel Smith, 08:11
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, Rob Vandeweyer, 07:50
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, J. Daniel Smith, 07:46
- Cloning within a LOCKFILE block, Bill Moseley, 07:15
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, Rob Vandeweyer, 05:45
October 11, 1997
- Re: Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, Mike de Laine, 23:37
- SPAM Prevention and "Return-Path:" ??, pi, 23:26
- Filtering out unwanted mime attachments, Mike A. Harris, 20:42
- Re: manpages extraction problem, Jari Aalto, 13:22
- Re: Setting different FROM when using formail -rt ?, Jari Aalto, 13:22
- Re: executing PGP-signed commands with procmail, Roman Czyborra, 10:38
- Re: manpages extraction problem, Roman Czyborra, 10:37
- Re: manpages extraction problem, Gregory Sutter, 08:41
- Re: manpages extraction problem, William Guynes, 08:05
- Re: Setting different FROM when using formail -rt ?, J. Daniel Smith, 05:22
- What is the WHOTO var?, david hunt, 00:28
October 10, 1997
- manpages extraction problem, William Guynes, 22:40
- Trash Hotmail, etc: was Re: Decent people, Felix Tilley, 20:21
- Re: Setting different FROM when using formail -rt ?, Eli the Bearded, 19:22
- Re: date parsing (was: Incrementing a counter), Rik Kabel, 16:18
- Re: Setting different FROM when using formail -rt ?, James L. McGill, 14:17
- Re: Setting different FROM when using formail -rt ?, Edward J. Sabol, 14:09
- Re: Setting different FROM when using formail -rt ?, David W. Tamkin, 13:10
- Setting different FROM when using formail -rt ?, Jari Aalto, 12:41
- Re: "Decent people", Michael Stone, 10:47
- Re: DCE/DFS Procmail problem, Mark Plaksin, 10:19
- Re: QUESTION: Making MIME not MIME, J. Daniel Smith, 09:20
- Re: Return Receipt, Philip Guenther, 08:38
- Re: Being notified when text contains your name, era eriksson, 08:11
- Re: Being notified when text contains your name, Bryan Farrish, 08:08
- Looking for documentation, Sheryl Chapin, 07:16
- Re: Global vs. local lockfiles, era eriksson, 07:05
- Re: Return Receipt, Liston Bias, 06:53
- Re: QUESTION: Making MIME not MIME, era eriksson, 06:51
- QUESTION: Making MIME not MIME, _Clint_, 06:28
- Global vs. local lockfiles, Bill Moseley, 06:28
- Re: "Decent people", Stan Ryckman, 06:25
- Re: executing PGP-signed commands with procmail, era eriksson, 04:09
- Re: Proper for the list, J. Daniel Smith, 03:29
- Re: Stripping HTML: Another Question, Roman Czyborra, 01:34
- executing PGP-signed commands with procmail, Roman Czyborra, 01:33
- Re: Incrementing a counter, era eriksson, 01:11
- date parsing (was: Incrementing a counter), J. Daniel Smith, 00:56
- Re: Stripping HTML: Another Question, era eriksson, 00:43
October 09, 1997
- Re: getting rid of all but certain headers, Leif Erlingsson, 23:18
- Re: "Decent people", Leif Erlingsson, 23:15
- Re: "Decent people", Felix Tilley, 22:45
- Re: Stripping HTML: Another Question, Michael Stone, 22:00
- Re: Stripping HTML: Another Question, _Clint_, 19:51
- Re: Proper for the list, Wotan, 18:23
- Re: Stripping HTML: Another Question, Michael Stone, 16:04
- Re: exec'ing from procmail, Philip Guenther, 15:47
- Re: exec'ing from procmail, Christopher Davis, 15:45
- Re: exec'ing from procmail, Edward J. Sabol, 15:32
- Re: Incrementing a counter, Edward J. Sabol, 15:26
- Re: Stripping HTML: Another Question, Eli the Bearded, 15:19
- DCE/DFS Procmail problem, David Rankin, 13:57
- Stripping HTML: Another Question, _Clint_, 13:50
- exec'ing from procmail, Waxahachiefortudinouslyexportitionismistically, 13:24
- question on delivering rule, Denis B. Roegel, 13:23
- Incrementing a counter, Bill Moseley, 12:42
- Have procmail continue to parse a message after a condition is met., John Kelley, 12:33
- Maildir patches for procmail (revised), Bruce Guenter, 10:11
- Re: Catting a nastygram at the top of the body, David W. Tamkin, 10:06
- Re: Self-Modifying .procmailrc, David W. Tamkin, 09:59
- Re: recursive INCLUDERC tricks - dirname.rc, David W. Tamkin, 09:45
- Re: Being notified when text contains your name, era eriksson, 07:38
- Being notified when text contains your name, Bryan Farrish, 06:43
- recursive INCLUDERC tricks - dirname.rc, J. Daniel Smith, 05:22
- procmail, Roger Whitcomb, 04:11
- Spam on News - Rookie question, Charles Pitre, 02:54
- Re: getting rid of all but certain headers, J. Daniel Smith, 02:23
- Re: Proper for the list, J. Daniel Smith, 02:16
- Re: Spamford's back on line, J. Daniel Smith, 02:04
- Tangential: FAQ frequency, era eriksson, 00:48
- Re: Procmail archive!, Andreas Sikkema, 00:23
October 08, 1997
- Procmail archive!, Andreas Sikkema, 23:40
- Re: getting rid of all but certain headers, david hunt, 22:25
- Re: Catting a nastygram at the top of the body, Ken Hooper, 20:40
- procmail and "nice", Timothy J Luoma, 16:26
- Re: Spamford's back on line, Ralf Meyer, 15:40
- perl5.4.3 and procmail, Bear of Very Little Brain, 13:50
- Stripping out HTML tags, Kragen Sitaker, 13:38
- Re: Re:/Fwd perversions, Eli the Bearded, 13:28
- "Decent people" (was Re: Spamford's back on line), Bob Weissman, 13:03
- Re: Self-Modifying .procmailrc, Jari Aalto, 12:41
- Re: Procmail & Netscape/Mozilla, David W. Tamkin, 11:58
- Re: Catting a nastygram at the top of the body, David W. Tamkin, 11:55
- Re:/Fwd perversions, Ben Stuyts, 11:46
- Re: Procmail & Netscape/Mozilla - warning, Mike de Laine, 11:05
- Re: Spamford's back on line, Mike de Laine, 10:53
- Catting a nastygram at the top of the body, Ken Hooper, 10:47
- mail notification, Todd Waxahachiefortudinouslyexportitionismistically Hartman, 10:47
- Re: (off-topic) msn.com wants cookies (was spamford back...), W. Wesley Groleau x4923, 09:24
- [ANN] SpamTrap (spam filter pkg) available, Farhad Anklesaria, 09:00
- Re: (procmail) Re: Spamford's back on line, rali, 07:48
- Netscape 'Communicator', R Lindberg / E Winnie, 07:42
- Re: (procmail) Re: Spamford's back on line, era eriksson, 07:35
- Re: checking return value of program called by procmail, era eriksson, 07:32
- Re: (procmail) Re: Spamford's back on line, rali, 06:36
- Re: Spamford's back on line, W. Wesley Groleau x4923, 06:22
- checking return value of program called by procmail, Denis B. Roegel, 06:12
- Re: Spamford's back on line, Jack Lyons, 03:55
- Re: getting rid of all but certain headers, Wotan, 00:04
October 07, 1997
- Re: How to send a little notify about new email..., Mike, 22:38
- Re: Spamford's back on line, Ken Hooper, 22:38
- Re: Spamford's back on line, Timothy J Luoma, 22:00
- Re: Spamford's back on line, Felix Tilley, 21:21
- getting rid of all but certain headers, Timothy J Luoma, 21:19
- Re: Proper for the list, Timothy J Luoma, 20:02
- Proper for the list, Wotan, 19:36
- Re: procmail-d Digest V97 #308, gill(_at_)topsecret(_dot_)net, 16:14
- Re: Spamford's back on line, Professional Software Engineering, 15:00
- Re: Spamford's back on line, Lars Hecking, 14:13
- Re: Spamford's back on line, Ralf Meyer, 14:03
- Re: Spamford's back on line, Professional Software Engineering, 13:43
- How to send a little notify about new email..., Tapani Kunnas, 13:42
- Re: Spamford's back on line, era eriksson, 13:41
- Re: Spamford's back on line, Matthew G. Saroff (Do not Reply to this Address), 13:19
- Re: Cyberpromo seems to be back on line, era eriksson, 12:39
- Spamford's back on line, Matthew G. Saroff (Do not Reply to this Address), 12:25
- Cyberpromo seems to be back on line, Matthew G. Saroff (Do not Reply to this Address), 12:20
- Re: QUESTION: stripping HTML out of incoming mail, J. Daniel Smith, 10:35
- Re: sort by size, David W. Tamkin, 10:29
- Re: Self-Modifying .procmailrc, David W. Tamkin, 10:19
- default delivery w/ Cyrus IMAP Server..., Marc Fournier, 10:03
- Re: problem with environment variable which is lost, Denis B. Roegel, 09:41
- Re: QUESTION: stripping HTML out of incoming mail, era eriksson, 09:32
- Re: Self-Modifying .procmailrc, era eriksson, 09:26
- Re: Self-Modifying .procmailrc, Timothy J Luoma, 09:26
- Re: Self-Modifying .procmailrc, J. Daniel Smith, 09:26
- Re: problem with environment variable which is lost, era eriksson, 09:12
- QUESTION: stripping HTML out of incoming mail, _Clint_, 09:11
- Re: sort by size, Timothy J Luoma, 09:05
- unsubscribe, Dilip Vazirani, 08:22
- Re: Self-Modifying .procmailrc, Jari Aalto, 08:22
- formail+procmail, Claudio Martos, 07:50
- Re: Procmail & Netscape/Mozilla - warning, Clemens Brogi, 07:38
- problem with environment variable which is lost, Denis B. Roegel, 06:30
- Re: Self-Modifying .procmailrc, Timothy J Luoma, 05:36
- Re: matching syntax?, J. Daniel Smith, 05:29
- Re: Self-Modifying .procmailrc, David W. Tamkin, 05:15
- Re: Auto-identifying languages - samples needed., Paul Castro, 02:28
- Re: Auto-identifying languages - samples needed., Stephane Bortzmeyer, 01:40
- Re: HTML mailer bouncing, Stephan Witoszynskyj, 00:34
October 06, 1997
- Your Web Site's Findability, Planet_Ocean, 23:13
- Re: Mailing list sorting recipe, William J. Evans; mail protected by spamgard{tm}, 22:49
- Re: formail reply of message body without prefix, david hunt, 22:05
- Re: formail reply of message body without prefix, Ken Hooper, 21:59
- Re: Maildir, Edward S. Marshall, 21:00
- Re: Self-Modifying .procmailrc, Timothy J Luoma, 19:57
- formail reply of message body without prefix, mark david mcCreary, 19:40
- Self-Modifying .procmailrc, Matthew G. Saroff, 19:21
- Re: fgrep -i condition-line potential Solaris bug, John Gianni, 18:57
- Other SPAM references, Karl E. Vogel, 17:38
- matching syntax?, Tomas Karlsson, 16:25
- Re: Mailing list sorting recipe, Philip Guenther, 16:12
- lockfile for mail reading and delivery, David W. Tamkin, 16:11
- Re: fgrep -i condition-line potential Solaris bug, John Gianni, 16:10
- Re: Procmail & Netscape/Mozilla - warning, Professional Software Engineering, 15:51
- Re: Procmail & Netscape/Mozilla - warning, Alan V. Shackelford, 13:36
- Auto-identifying languages - samples needed., W. Wesley Groleau x4923, 13:32
- Re: Mailing list sorting recipe, Louis-David Mitterrand, 13:06
- Re: /etc/procmailrc and Unix limits, Philip Guenther, 13:03
- Re: Mailing list sorting recipe, Philip Guenther, 12:57
- Procmail & Netscape/Mozilla - warning, Mike de Laine, 10:07
- Re: Req: simple scoring stuff, W. Wesley Groleau x4923, 08:08
- Re: /var/mail or $HOME/.mail, era eriksson; not telling what I do to my mail{tm}, 08:01
- Re: /var/mail or $HOME/.mail, William J. Evans; mail protected by spamgard{tm}, 07:40
- Re: Denis Roegel's $FOUND, David W. Tamkin, 06:30
- Re: Req: simple scoring stuff, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:36
- Re: echo vs. cat, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:33
October 05, 1997
- Re: /var/mail or $HOME/.mail, era eriksson, 23:02
- Re: procmail-d Digest V97 #302, Adriano Barenco, 22:01
- Likely to lose anything else?, Wotan, 21:35
- /etc/procmailrc and Unix limits, Jason Haar, 20:19
- /var/mail or $HOME/.mail, Douglas Semonche, 18:51
- Re: fgrep -i condition-line potential Solaris bug, Timothy J Luoma, 18:31
- fgrep -i condition-line potential Solaris bug, John Gianni, 17:59
- Re: SmartList Implementation, Timothy J Luoma, 16:58
- Re: SmartList Implementation, Liston Bias, 15:11
- Maildir, Edward King, 14:53
- Re: how to save the From, To: and Cc: fields in env. vars ?, era eriksson, 13:49
- how to save the From, To: and Cc: fields in env. vars ?, Denis B. Roegel, 13:18
- Re: Denis Roegel's $FOUND, Denis B. Roegel, 13:15
- Re: HTML mailer bouncing, Jari Aalto, 11:32
October 04, 1997
- Re: getting off the list, Wotan, 17:32
- Re: 'Match' even if regexp has syntax-error? Huh?, David W. Tamkin, 17:18
- 'Match' even if regexp has syntax-error? Huh?, david hunt, 16:26
- Mailing list sorting recipe, Louis-David Mitterrand, 14:47
- mailing list sorting recipe, Louis-David Mitterrand, 13:59
- Re: getting off the list, Timothy J Luoma, 10:22
- Re: Req: simple scoring stuff, J. Daniel Smith, 08:24
- Re: My SPAM-filtering .procmailrc, J. Daniel Smith, 08:16
- Recipe error, Suresh Rajagopalan, 00:52
October 03, 1997
- Re: NFS, Ralph Sims, 22:44
- Re: getting off the list, Wotan, 22:03
- Re: Req: simple scoring stuff, Wotan, 22:02
- Re: Regex failure?, Philip Guenther, 16:54
- Regex failure?, Gerben Wierda, 15:27
- correction of my $FOUND post, David W. Tamkin, 10:08
- Denis Roegel's $FOUND, David W. Tamkin, 09:42
- Re: HTML mailer bouncing, Kimmo Jaskari, 08:35
- getting off the list, Tanya Corrin, 08:06
- My SPAM-filtering .procmailrc, Gordon Matzigkeit, 07:50
October 02, 1997
- Re: NFS, Edward S. Marshall, 20:26
- Re: still problems with environment variables, Edward J. Sabol, 14:55
- Re: still problems with environment variables, Philip Guenther, 14:48
- Re: NFS, Philip Guenther, 13:36
- still problems with environment variables, Denis B. Roegel, 13:19
- NFS, James L. McGill, 11:57
- Re: Compiling (again), Philip Guenther, 09:41
- Req: simple scoring stuff, Timothy J Luoma, 09:36
- Re: echo vs. cat, Philip Guenther, 09:32
- Re: procmail-d Digest V97 #302, Tanya Corrin, 08:41
- Re: echo vs. cat, Michael Stone, 08:15
- Re: echo vs. cat, Timothy J Luoma, 07:57
- Compiling (again), bts8, 07:41
- Re: echo vs. cat, J. Daniel Smith, 07:34
- Re: "mail" matching ^FROM_DAEMON (was: Rant about spamgard), Eli the Bearded, 07:20
- echo vs. cat, W. Wesley Groleau x4923, 06:25
- creating message/rfc822 bounces, J. Daniel Smith, 03:53
- Re: SpamBouncing of procmail-d, J. Daniel Smith, 03:35
- "mail" matching ^FROM_DAEMON (was: Rant about spamgard), J. Daniel Smith, 03:14
October 01, 1997
- Re: Rant about spamgard (off-topic), William J. Evans; mail protected by spamgard{tm}, 22:18
- Re: regarding the spamgard thread, William J. Evans; mail protected by spamgard{tm}, 22:18
- Re: HTML mailer bouncing, Edward S. Marshall, 21:07
- Re: Extracting envelope to, Philip Guenther, 19:48
- Re: Extracting envelope to, Philip Guenther, 18:25
- Re: Extracting envelope to, Philip Guenther, 17:45
- Re: Extracting envelope to, Geoff Mulligan, 17:22
- Re: Extracting envelope to, Geoff Mulligan, 17:00
- Re: Extracting envelope to, Edward J. Sabol, 15:54
- Re: "Authenticated sender" gives false positive, Edward J. Sabol, 15:39
- Re: "Out of memory" in procmail log file, Philip Guenther, 15:04
- Re: Extracting envelope to, Philip Guenther, 15:01
- Re: "Authenticated sender" gives false positive, Michael Stone, 15:01
- Re: "Authenticated sender" gives false positive, Timothy J Luoma, 14:20
- "Authenticated sender" gives false positive, Matt Garretson, 13:48
- Re: Extracting envelope to, Geoff Mulligan, 13:32
- Re: HTML mailer bouncing, Michael Stone, 13:27
- Re: domain list, Professional Software Engineering, 13:02
- domain list, Derald Muniz, 12:14
- Re: HTML mailer bouncing, Ed McGuire, 11:26
- regarding the spamgard thread, David W. Tamkin, 10:37
- Re: Rant about spamgard (off-topic), Ed McGuire, 10:03
- Re: HTML mailer bouncing, J. Daniel Smith, 09:12
- Re: Rant about spamgard (off-topic), Eli the Bearded, 09:05
- SpamBouncing of procmail-d, Christopher Biow, 08:36
- Re: Procmail and multiple rules, Ed McGuire, 08:27
- HTML mailer bouncing, Kimmo Jaskari, 07:59
- Re: Rant about spamgard (off-topic), William J. Evans; mail protected by spamgard{tm}, 07:57
- Re: Rant about spamgard (off-topic), William J. Evans; mail protected by spamgard{tm}, 07:55
- Re: Rant about spamgard (off-topic), William J. Evans; mail protected by spamgard{tm}, 07:52
- procmail changes (was: Rant about spamgard), J. Daniel Smith, 05:44
- Re: Rant about spamgard (off-topic), Wotan, 04:55
- Re: Rant about spamgard (off-topic), J. Daniel Smith, 03:31
- "Out of memory" in procmail log file, Jong tae, Kim, 02:55
- Re: Rant about spamgard (off-topic), J. Daniel Smith, 02:14
- Re: .forward problem -- Thanks!, Hubert Palme, 01:45
- Re: Rant about spamgard (off-topic), Tim, 00:02
September 30, 1997
- Re: Procmail and multiple rules, era eriksson, 22:53
- Re: Help with popclient+procmail+formail..., Philip Guenther, 22:08
- Re: Multiple actions, Philip Guenther, 22:06
- Re: Rant about spamgard (off-topic), Timothy J Luoma, 20:55
- Re: Rant about spamgard (off-topic), William J. Evans; mail protected by spamgard{tm}, 20:25
- Re: whitelisting bad?, William J. Evans; mail protected by spamgard{tm}, 20:25
- Procmail and multiple rules, Akis Karnouskos, 17:14
- Re: Extracting envelope to, Philip Guenther, 16:40
- Re: whitelisting bad?, Timothy J Luoma, 16:15
- Rant about spamgard (off-topic), Eli the Bearded, 15:50