Re: timestamp spam filter

procmail

1997-10-17 13:03:20

Excerpts from mail: (17-Oct-97) timestamp spam filter by { brad brace }

What recipe would catch "bad timestamps?"


# Known spam software signature. -0600 is not EST. EDT is not -0700 either.
:0:
* ^Received:.* (-0600 \(EST\)|-0700 \(EDT\))( |$)
mbox.spam

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Unrecgonized options: "Y", Douglas Semonche Re: Unrecgonized options: "Y", Philip Guenther timestamp spam filter, { brad brace } GNU sed version 2.05 is broken?, Chris Bidmead Re: GNU sed version 2.05 is broken?, Peter S Galbraith Re: timestamp spam filter, Edward J. Sabol <= procmail: Skipped "E", { brad brace } Re: procmail: Skipped "E", Timothy J Luoma Re: procmail: Skipped "E", Philip Guenther

Previous by Date:	Re: More about problems with large email?, Philip Guenther
Next by Date:	Re: GNU sed version 2.05 is broken?, William J. Evans; mail protected by spamgard{tm}
Previous by Thread:	Re: GNU sed version 2.05 is broken?, Peter S Galbraith
Next by Thread:	procmail: Skipped "E", { brad brace }
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]