era eriksson writes on 20 October 1997 at 11:05:56
[...]
IMHO it could be a good idea to include an example of this in the
procmailex man page. You frequently see people do this:
:0
* condition
{
:0c
! address(_at_)one(_dot_)com
:0c
! address(_at_)two(_dot_)net
:0
! address(_at_)three(_dot_)org
}
when it would be perfectly sufficient to say
:0
* condition
! address(_at_)one(_dot_)com address(_at_)two(_dot_)net
address(_at_)three(_dot_)org
It might depend on how frequently you edit this code - the first
format makes it easier to comment out an address, and to tell that
you've commented it out.
But as someone suggested last week...it's a good idea to show multiple
ways to do the same thing.
Dan
------------------- message is author's opinion only ------------------
J. Daniel Smith <DanS(_at_)bristol(_dot_)com>
http://www.bristol.com/~DanS
Bristol Technology B.V. +31 33 450 50 50, ...51 (FAX)
Amersfoort, The Netherlands {info,jobs}(_at_)bristol(_dot_)com