procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: anonymous e-mail

1997-11-16 14:07:40
| Sun 97-11-16 randy(_at_)essex(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk (Banks B J) list.procmail
| 
| > Hello.  I'm interested in sending anonymous e-mail.  Any information is
| > greatly appreciated.
| 
| a) anonymous e-mail tends to be used for spamming;

From the remailer operator list: (also in my page)

10.1 Efga remailer's mailserver and header munging

        ...Our mailserver implements mail blocks on IP addresses of many of
        the spam houses. We also reject mail with munged headers, a common
        spammer's practice. Since we throw away all envelopes, and even
        with munged headers you are still supplying your IP address, there
        is no point in munging the headers to the remailer. It is all
        automated. Munging headers does not increase security, but instead
        flags the message as a reject.

        I'm sure this throws away a lot of valid messages, but it also
        helps us prevent other problems we might have. And like has been
        mentioned before, our entire system is a 486-80 w/24MB RAM. We've
        crashed from Spam type abuse a few times already. The system is
        almost adequate for the load of remailer activity we have, but we
        need a beefier system for the realities the real world has to
        offer. We are being hammered by spam, so we reject it at the
        envelope level.

| b) a great deal of junk eminates from aol.com;

Sad and true. 

| I am very surprised that you have asked your question w/o providing
| any reasons as to why you might be interested in sending anonymous
| e-mail.
| 
| I certainly won't, and I very much hope and expect that no other member of
| this list will not, provide any answers to your question.

I don't take a side on this. But here is the statictics where the 
anynymous services are used in Usenet. I use the remailers and anon
accounts too. The necessary pointers to all these services can be found from
my home page

ftp://cs.uta.fi/pub/ssjaaa/ssjaaa.html#where_are_the_remailers_used

    10.4 Where are the remailers used for

        [andy dustman] Okay, let's take a look at what remailers are
        actually being used for. Go to dejanews and type in the addresses
        of all the remailers you know of, count the number of posts to each
        newsgroup and add them up. Here are the top twenty newsgroups that
        I got when I did this little experiment:

            10471 alt.anonymous.messages
             7272 alt.test
             6236 alt.hackintosh
             4392 alt.binaries.mac.games
             1326 misc.test
             1253 alt.religion.scientology
             1109 alt.sex.stories
             1023 soc.culture.singapore
              915 alt.amazon-women.admirers
              877 soc.culture.iranian
              770 alt.anonymous
              622 fj.news.usage
              573 alt.politics.nationalism.white
              571 alt.sex.spanking
              557 talk.politics.guns
              543 alt.tv.real-world
              518 alt.cracks
              517 alt.drugs.pot.cultivation
              512 alt.privacy.anon-server
              498 alt.revisionism

        So what are remailers being used for?

        .   Private communication in the form of anonymous message pools
        .   Test posts
        .   Discussion of Macintosh computers
        .   Discussion of obscure religions
        .   Sharing erotic fantasy stories
        .   Avoiding censorship in Singapore
        .   Avoiding censorship in Iran
        .   Discussion of remailers themselves
        .   Discussion of controvertial political topics (racism, guns, drugs)
        .   Discussion about a TV show

        Note that this list does not include harassing Grandma, money
        laundering, and all your other delusional terrorist fantasies.
        Welcome to the real world.
  

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>