Specific number of digits

procmail

1997-12-12 17:19:19

At 11:17 PM 12/10/97 -0600, Peter Seebach wrote:


Hmm.  Wouldn't '[0-9][0-9]...' work?  I don't know if procmail does
things like [0-9]{5}.

Would [0-9]{5,} be a legal call for specifically *at least* 5 digits
in a procmail recipe???

Eric

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
homemade soap receipe, skerbrat Re: homemade soap receipe, Peter Seebach Re: homemade soap receipe, Ralf Meyer Re: homemade soap receipe (AND Beyond), Eric Hilding Re: homemade soap receipe (AND Beyond), Aaron Schrab Re: homemade soap receipe (AND Beyond), Peter Seebach Specific number of digits, Eric Hilding <= Re: Specific number of digits, Aaron Schrab Re: homemade soap receipe (AND Beyond), gsutter Re: homemade soap receipe, Ralph Sims Re: homemade soap receipe, Jonathan Kelly

Previous by Date:	Help with recipe, Scott Blomquist
Next by Date:	Re: Forwarding mail from user+foo to foo, rsr
Previous by Thread:	Re: homemade soap receipe (AND Beyond), Peter Seebach
Next by Thread:	Re: Specific number of digits, Aaron Schrab
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]