From: Ralph SOBEK <sobek(_at_)irit(_dot_)fr>
To: procmail(_at_)informatik(_dot_)rwth-aachen(_dot_)de
Subject: Trouble with procmail v3.11pre7 and dependant recipes
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 19:11:14 +0100 (MET)
Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 20:04:27 +0100 (MET)
Resent-Message-ID: <"PPz2mB.A.V3G.IHw90"@campino>
Resent-From: procmail(_at_)informatik(_dot_)rwth-aachen(_dot_)de
Resent-Sender: procmail-request(_at_)informatik(_dot_)rwth-aachen(_dot_)de
X-Url: http://www.irit.fr/SSI/~Ralph.Sobek/
Organization: IRIT (CNRS), Toulouse, France
Hello Folks,
I sent the following message out on Feb. 27th, but we also had
mailer troubles at that time. So maybe the following never made it
out. I never received any replies. Sorry if this is old stuff to
you, but I still haven't gotten this to work.
I need a complicated condition that has to be done by a
program using both headers and body. If the program exits without an
error, I would then like another program to do the action.
Is this possible with procmail? Here is what my script looks
like (names were changed to protect the innocent):
:0
* ^TOsobek
* ^Subject:.*test
{
:0 hbw
| $HOME/bin/check-abstract
:0 ahbw
| (formail -r -k -A"Precedence: junk" -A"X-Loop: sobek(_at_)irit(_dot_)fr" \
-i"Reply-To: foo(_at_)bar(_dot_)com" ; \
echo "Test Message" ; \
cat $HOME/mail/ack.txt ) | $SENDMAIL -t
}
Any and all suggestions welcome.
A nice weekend to all,
--Ralph
Dr. Ralph P. Sobek Disclaimer: The above ruminations are my own.
Ralph(_dot_)Sobek(_at_)irit(_dot_)fr Addresses are
ordered by importance.
sobek(_at_)irit(_dot_)fr If all else
fails, try:
newsmaster(_at_)irit(_dot_)fr, postmaster(_at_)irit(_dot_)fr
sobek(_at_)diva(_dot_)eecs(_dot_)berkeley(_dot_)edu
Ph:(+33)[0]561558618 FAX:(+33)[0]561556258 http://www.irit.fr/SSI/~Ralph.Sobek/
===============================================================================
The truth about the Past is really all we have to guide us in the Present
-- Mary Benson (1964)