Can somebody send me the recipe to put at the end of a .procmailrc
that will forward all unhandled mail to a certain location.
thank in advance
Philip Guenther wrote:
Julien CASSAIGNE <cassaign(_at_)iml(_dot_)univ-mrs(_dot_)fr> writes:
I have the following recipe
:0fc
* $^From:.*(${RECIP_REGEXP})
| formail -a "Reply-To: gourous(_at_)eleves(_dot_)ens(_dot_)fr (Compte
Gourous)"
which is meant to insert a Reply-To: line in messages coming from
certain people. It works very well most of the time, but once in
a while (several messages a day go through this recipe, and the error
accurs about once per month) I get the following error:
procmail: Extraneous filter-flag ignored
procmail: Error while writing to ""
procmail: Skipped "| formail -a "Reply-To:
gourous(_at_)eleves(_dot_)ens(_dot_)fr (Compte Gouro
us)""
The above errors indicate that there's a blank line in your
.procmailrc. The version of procmail processing your .procmailrc is
interpreting this as a action line with the empty mailbox name. Since
the filter-flag makes no sense when writing to a mailbox, you get the
"Extraneous foo-flag ignored" warning, followed by the error when
writing to the bogus mailbox. Then when procmail gets to the real
action line, it skips it as a neither a recipe start nor a variable
assignment. Since procmail skips such blank lines in versions 3.11pre4
and later, your procmail is not truly being processed with 3.11pre4.
BTW: it is incorrect to include the 'c' flag with the 'f' flag: it is
implicit in the action of the 'f' flag to continue.
Philip Guenther
--
John Goodsen Saguaro Software, Inc. / Training & Consulting in:
jgoodsen(_at_)saguarosoft(_dot_)com - User Centered Systems Analysis
http://www.saguarosoft.com - Object Oriented Architecture and Design
602.283.0142 - Rapid Incremental Delivery S/W Process
888.298.2566