procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Outlook98/ Outlook express and procmail

1998-11-30 12:22:11
According to .maillog with verbose on,  it said:
procmail: Notified comsat: "wn(_at_)1174:/var/spool/mail/wn"
procmail: [9909] Mon Nov 30 13:35:48 1998
procmail: Assigning "PATH=/home/wn/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin"
procmail: No match on "^To: *news*"
procmail: No match on "^To: *news*"
procmail: No match on "^To: *phonebook*"
procmail: Locking "/var/spool/mail/wn.lock"
procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=/var/spool/mail/wn"
procmail: Opening "/var/spool/mail/wn"
procmail: Acquiring kernel-lock
procmail: Unlocking "/var/spool/mail/wn.lock"
From mstaley(_at_)clark(_dot_)net  Mon Nov 30 13:35:48 1998
 Subject: news
  Folder:
/var/spool/mail/wn                                                880
procmail: Notified comsat: "wn(_at_)2054:/var/spool/mail/wn"

so if I used netscape, the .maillog shows:
procmail: [9913] Mon Nov 30 13:36:45 1998
procmail: Assigning "PATH=/home/wn/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin"
procmail: Match on "^To: *news*"
procmail: Match on "^Subject: *news*"
procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER= (formail -rA "X-Loop:
news(_at_)datakids(_dot_)org" ; \
  /home/wn/newshdr.pl ) | $SENDMAIL -t"
From mstaley(_at_)vma(_dot_)verio(_dot_)net  Mon Nov 30 13:36:45 1998
 Subject: news
  Folder:  (formail -rA "X-Loop: news(_at_)datakids(_dot_)org" ; \  
/home/wn/news     795
procmail: Notified comsat: "wn@: (formail -rA "X-Loop:
news(_at_)datakids(_dot_)org" ; \
  /home/wn/newshdr.pl ) | $SENDMAIL -t"
procmail: Executing " (formail -rA "X-Loop: news(_at_)datakids(_dot_)org" ; \
  /home/wn/newshdr.pl ) | $SENDMAIL -t"

I don't understand what I did wrong.

Matt

Philip Guenther wrote:

Matt Staley <mstaley(_at_)vma(_dot_)verio(_dot_)net> writes:
The person with Outlook98/ Outlook express does not get the message back
at all.  According to log file, it was sent directly to the
.procmailrc's account inbox.  While all the other email client like
Netscape messenger, and pine gets the message back just fine.

Since procmail is being run, I would suggest turning VERBOSE to on,
sending another message, then checking to see what condition failed.

Philip Guenther