more of the same
could it be something to do with the length of the ``References'' line?
This is procmail 3.12 btw
Received: from bftoemail12.bigfoot.com [208.156.39.212] by 1stpc.org
(SMTPD32-4.04) id A867CDE50090; Fri, 02 Apr 1999 22:17:59 EST
Received: from public.lists.apple.com ([17.254.0.151]) by
bftoemail8.bigfoot.com (Bigfoot Toe Mail v1.0 with message handle
990402_221358_4_bftoemail8_smtp; Fri, 02 Apr 1999 22:13:58 -0500 for
tjlists(_at_)bigfoot(_dot_)com
Received: from localhost (daemon(_at_)localhost) by public.lists.apple.com
(8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id TAA38978 ; Fri, 2 Apr 1999 19:12:13 -0800
Received: by public.lists.apple.com (ulkmay_ailermay v1.5); Fri, 2 Apr 1999
19:12:12 -0800
Received: (from majordom(_at_)localhost) by public.lists.apple.com
(8.9.1a/8.9.1)
id TAA69462 ; Fri, 2 Apr 1999 19:11:13 -0800
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 1999 20:45:17 -0600
From: Stephen Crowley <crow(_at_)debian(_dot_)org>
To: publicsource <publicsource(_at_)public(_dot_)lists(_dot_)apple(_dot_)com>
Subject: Re: Trademark violation
Message-ID: <19990402204517(_dot_)B20539(_at_)stephenc(_dot_)wf(_dot_)net>
Mail-Followup-To: publicsource
<publicsource(_at_)public(_dot_)lists(_dot_)apple(_dot_)com>
References: <19990402151120(_dot_)A4816(_at_)stephenc(_dot_)wf(_dot_)net>
<Pine(_dot_)OBSD(_dot_)4(_dot_)05(_dot_)9904021543400(_dot_)26783-100000(_at_)xantham(_dot_)king(_dot_)net>
<19990402153934(_dot_)A5052(_at_)stephenc(_dot_)wf(_dot_)net>
<37054702(_dot_)33DA7271(_at_)rbbsystems(_dot_)com>
<19990402165706(_dot_)B18841(_at_)stephenc(_dot_)wf(_dot_)net>
<37058343(_dot_)47E89FA9(_at_)rbbsystems
X-Formail-Reply-To: crow(_at_)debian(_dot_)org
..com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i
In-Reply-To: <37058343(_dot_)47E89FA9(_at_)rbbsystems(_dot_)com>; from Nick
Bastin on Fri,
Apr 02, 1999 at 09:56:05PM -0500
Sender: owner-publicsource(_at_)public(_dot_)lists(_dot_)apple(_dot_)com
Precedence: bulk
X-UIDL: 920423709
Status: U