I sent a message to this list a little while ago and forgot to turn off
read-receipt requests. I do have a series of recipes in place to
store read receipts before they would reach my auto-reply setup.
However, three receipts with new-to-me permutations of headers have
so far slipped through (and been auto-acked for having sent a
read-receipt, which is, I confess, ugly).
I will revise my recipes. But I was rather miffed to find that
one mailer that supplies the identifying X-header
X-Lotus-FromDomain: [stuff]
as the only distinguishing characteristic about it that I can see,
does not say anyting like "((Read|Receipt):|Notification for) "
in the Subject:-line, but just says the standard "RE: [old subject]"!
I find this pretty lame. Am I supposed to grep all body text now for
read receipts? Obviously, I'll put in there the X-Lotus header,
but I'd like to know if this is SOP for Lotus Notes, or a bad
configuration, or what? Two have come in so far like this.
I find it just as bad as Microsoft list-mail that doesn't say "list"
anywhere in the headers.
--
\ .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. /
\-d-/-m-\-a-/-n-\-(_at_)-/-n-\-e-/-t-\-c-/-o-\-m-/-.-\-c-/-o-\-m-/
'-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-'