can someone shed some light why this mail made it to my spammers box
soon to be deleted
see recipe
----- Forwarded message from Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
<c948374-postfix(_at_)student(_dot_)dtu(_dot_)dk> -----
Errors-To: <owner-postfix-users(_at_)postfix(_dot_)org>
Delivered-To: postfix-users-outgoing(_at_)cloud9(_dot_)net
Delivered-To: postfix-users(_at_)cloud9(_dot_)net
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 11:49:45 +0100
From: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <c948374-postfix(_at_)student(_dot_)dtu(_dot_)dk>
To: Ralf Hildebrandt <Ralf(_dot_)Hildebrandt(_at_)innominate(_dot_)com>
Subject: Re: ehlo
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
In-Reply-To:
<news2mail-slrn9a9e9k(_dot_)rd9(_dot_)Ralf(_dot_)Hildebrandt(_at_)gulliver(_dot_)bln(_dot_)innominate(_dot_)de>;
from news-list(_dot_)postfix(_dot_)users(_at_)innominate(_dot_)de on Tue, Mar
06, 2001 at 10:17:24AM +0000
Precedence: bulk
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 10:17:24AM +0000, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Postfix only uses EHLO if the remote machine says it can handle it (ESMTP).
No. By default, Postfix scans the SMTP greeting for the string ESMTP as a
of crude way of detecting ESMTP capability before sending HELO/EHLO, but
obviously that's not reliable. The only way that the remote machine can tell
you about its ESMTP capabilities is in the reply to your EHLO command.
Regards,
Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
--
/¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯\
| Please do NOT Cc: to me or the |
| mailing list. I am on the list.|
-
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo(_at_)postfix(_dot_)org with content
(not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users
----- End forwarded message -----
--
SuSe 7.0 Linux 2.4.2 i686 Tue Mar 13 07:05:00 EST 2001
spam.rc
Description: Text document