procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Netiquette questions

2001-05-29 16:20:07
At 15:07 2001-05-29 -0700, CueMan wrote:

Sorry if this runs the risk of being off-topic,

Very OT.

but where else might I sample the most expert collective wisdom of current Internet email netiquette.

On usenet?  Perhaps a few pointed websearches?

Dumb question (I really don't know) #1:

Is there a reason going around for using only lower-case text in email
messages?

Because it is a LOT less obnoxious than all uppercase. However, lack of proper capitalization, punctuation, and spelling (or some semblance of an attempt at it), is viewed by many as the sign of a weak mind. Remember that content on the web and on mailing lists is being archived all over the place.

Dumb question (Thought I new, but I might not) #2:

When 'Replying' to an email message, an 'Re: ' is inserted at the
beginning of the 'Subject: ' field, does 'Re: ' stand for 'Reply'
or 'Regarding'?

Take your pick. In traditional correspondence, RE: would signify regarding. However, since Fwd: is seen on some messages (signifying "forward"), Re: could be interpreted as "Reply". The difference is negligible -- if you are REPLYING to a message, isn't your reply REGARDING that message?

---
 Sean B. Straw / Professional Software Engineering

 Procmail disclaimer: <http://www.professional.org/procmail/disclaimer.html>
 Please DO NOT carbon me on list replies.  I'll get my copy from the list.

_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>