procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Malformed RFC822 headers - continuation lines not indented

2002-01-26 12:44:09
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Lars Hecking wrote:

Hhm, it was W32/Aliz, not Badtrans. See
  http://www.amavis.org/security/asa-2001-1.txt

The headers following the (properly indented) MIME headers were
indented too (which caused reformime to barf).

Ah! Okay, then, I was probably misremembering the symptom then.

I was going to see anout sanitizing unindented continuation lines, but
sanitizing valid header lines that should not be indented is not
something I want to attempt.

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZ    ICQ#15735746    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 jhardin(_at_)impsec(_dot_)org                       pgpk -a 
jhardin(_at_)wolfenet(_dot_)com
  768: 0x41EA94F5 - A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5  E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76 
 1024: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
  In 1998 more than three times as many people in the US were killed
  by incompetent physicians than were killed by handguns, yet the
  President of the A.M.A. is adopting "gun safety" as his platform.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
   1011 days until the Presidential Election

_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>