At 16:42 2002-08-05 -0400, Curtis Maurand did say:
Forgive my naivete, I may be wrong, but isn't the recipe below an "anded"
recipe instead of an "or" recipe?
Shouldn't it be something like:
:0:
* ^(to|from|cc)(_dot_)*procmail(_at_)lists\(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen\(_dot_)DE
^(to|from|cc)(_dot_)*procmail-users(_at_)procmail\(_dot_)org
Proc
If the second "condition" line started with "*", it would be an ANDed
recipe. But since it doesn't, what it is is a BROKEN recipe.
If the first condition line ended with:
| \
you'd have an or, as was sort of offered in the original, but was BROKEN
there as well because each of the continued lines started with an *
>> :0
>> * ^To:(_dot_)*procmail(_at_)Lists\(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen\(_dot_)DE(_dot_)*|\
>> * ^To:(_dot_)*procmail-users(_at_)procmail\(_dot_)org(_dot_)*|\
>> * ^Cc:(_dot_)*procmail-users(_at_)procmail\(_dot_)org(_dot_)*
>> Proc
[bigass snip]
:0
* ^(To:(_dot_)*procmail(_at_)lists\(_dot_)rwth-aachen\(_dot_)de|\
To:(_dot_)*procmail-users(_at_)procmail\(_dot_)org|\
Cc:(_dot_)*procmail-users(_at_)procmail\(_dot_)org)
Proc
(note trailing .* were removed - they're TOTALLY uncalled for here).
---
Sean B. Straw / Professional Software Engineering
Procmail disclaimer: <http://www.professional.org/procmail/disclaimer.html>
Please DO NOT carbon me on list replies. I'll get my copy from the list.
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail