Cat continued,
| Is there any chance of procmail getting the {n,m} regexp construct?
If it ever does, it will have to be of the form \{n,m\} so as not to break any
current recipes where unsescaped braces are in regexps are to be taken
literally. So technically, it may have that function some day but it will
never have that construct.
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail