Re: Message Ids

On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 10:28:33AM -0800, Professional Software Engineering 
wrote:

If you want to get picky, anyone with a dynamic IP address falls into the 
same category.  As will any situation where the LHS doesn't contain a 
timestamp component.


And to be even more picky, mail servers should never be on dynamic IP
addresses.

-- 
Andrew Edelstein        -       http://andrew.pure-chaos.com/resume.txt

Please do not reply directly to me, or Cc: me on a reply to a list message.
I'll get my copy from the list.

_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Message Ids, LuKreme Re: Message Ids, Alan Clifford Re: Message Ids, Professional Software Engineering Message not available Re: Message Ids, Andrew Edelstein <= Re: Message Ids, LuKreme Message not available Re: Message Ids, Paul Chvostek Re: Message Ids, dman Message not available Re: Message Ids, Paul Chvostek Re: Message Ids, Bart Schaefer Message not available Re: Message Ids, Paul Chvostek RE: Message Ids, Dallman Ross

Previous by Date:	Decoding inline base64; a working solution for you to trash. =), Tony L. Svanstrom
Next by Date:	The most useless procmailrecipe-award - and the nominated are..., Tony L. Svanstrom
Previous by Thread:	Re: Message Ids, Professional Software Engineering
Next by Thread:	Re: Message Ids, LuKreme
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]