Procmail (date)
January 31, 2003
- Re: suspect mailers (was Re: restricted form), Professional Software Engineering, 15:45
- Re: restricted form, Tony L. Svanstrom, 15:34
- Re: restricted form, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 15:23
- Re: restricted form, Alan Clifford, 14:41
- Re: restricted form, fleet, 13:53
- Re: restricted form/mailer frequency listing enclosed, Gary, 13:39
- spaces in recipes, David Turley, 13:20
- Re: restricted form, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 13:20
- Re: restricted form, David Turley, 12:31
- Re: suspect mailers (was Re: restricted form), David Turley, 12:23
- Re: suspect mailers (was Re: restricted form), David Turley, 12:18
- Re: restricted form, fleet, 11:36
- Re: suspect mailers (was Re: restricted form), Scott Wiersdorf, 11:36
- Re: suspect mailers (was Re: restricted form), fleet, 11:27
- Re: suspect mailers (was Re: restricted form), Scott Wiersdorf, 11:19
- Re: restricted form, Professional Software Engineering, 11:14
- Re: suspect mailers (was Re: restricted form), Professional Software Engineering, 11:06
- Re: restricted form, Professional Software Engineering, 10:59
- Re: suspect mailers (was Re: restricted form), James C. McMaster (Jim), 10:52
- Re: suspect mailers (was Re: restricted form), dman, 10:45
- Re: suspect mailers (was Re: restricted form), Lars Hecking, 10:36
- Re: restricted form, Gary, 10:29
- suspect mailers (was Re: restricted form), David Turley, 10:11
- Re: restricted form, fleet, 09:51
- Re: restricted form, fleet, 09:51
- Re: [To Field and Cc: field problem], Ganeshh, 07:42
- Re: restricted form, dman, 05:02
January 30, 2003
- Re: restricted form, Professional Software Engineering, 22:49
- restricted form, fleet, 21:17
- Re: regular exression question, Miernik, 15:29
- RE: regular exression question, Fredrik Rodland, 15:25
- regular exression question, Manojav Sridhar, 15:00
- Re: [To Field and Cc: field problem], Nancy McGough, 03:47
- Re: multiple action on delivered-main, dman, 02:29
- [To Field and Cc: field problem], Ganeshh, 01:20
January 29, 2003
- Re: multiple action on delivered-main, LuKreme, 16:05
- Re: multiple action on delivered-main, Holger Wahlen, 15:58
- Re: multiple action on delivered-main, dman, 14:52
- Re: Problem with auto-reponse, David W. Tamkin, 14:27
- multiple action on delivered-main, Manojav Sridhar, 14:19
- X-Loop and forward mail problem., S Semple, 11:33
- Problem with auto-reponse, Laurent Balloy, 11:19
- Re: Problem with auto-reponse, Professional Software Engineering, 10:45
- Re: Problem with auto-reponse, LuKreme, 10:02
January 28, 2003
- Re: Header problem, Nancy McGough, 05:10
- Header problem, Laurent Balloy, 04:25
- Re: YAVR (Yet Another Virus Recipe) :-), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 04:10
- Re: YAVR (Yet Another Virus Recipe) :-), Nikos K. Kantarakias, 01:50
- Re: YAVR (Yet Another Virus Recipe) :-), Nikos K. Kantarakias, 01:38
January 27, 2003
- "Couldn't create . . .", dman, 19:52
- Extract email attachment, Denis So, 19:24
- Re: Messages from a country, Dan Hollis, 19:06
- using another group, Jeff Orrok, 19:06
- Re: Messages from a country, Alan Clifford, 18:37
- Re: Stricter file permission message, Andy druda, 18:37
- Stricter file permission message, Andy druda, 18:09
- Messages from a country, Filipe de Moraes Paiva, 16:30
- Re: "Couldn't create . . .", dman, 16:23
January 23, 2003
- Re: Comparing with a file contents to forward mail, Don Hammond, 16:12
- procmail MH-format delivery/locking "bug", Bart Schaefer, 16:02
- Re: Comparing with a file contents to forward mail, Nikos K. Kantarakias, 15:49
- Re: date filtering of old messages, Alan Clifford, 14:22
- Re: HTML to text, David W. Tamkin, 14:03
- Re: HTML to text, LuKreme, 13:50
- Re: HTML to text, LuKreme, 11:53
- Re: Internal IP address obfuscation?, Professional Software Engineering, 11:38
- Re: Hidden body html text, Jefferis Peterson, 08:07
- Re: Hidden body html text, Jefferis Peterson, 08:00
- HTML to text, C J Kenneth Tan, 07:09
- Spamlister, mimo, 05:11
- Internal IP address obfuscation?, dman, 04:23
- Re: Hidden body html text, LuKreme, 03:52
- Comparing with a file contents to forward mail, Antonio Mollinedo, 01:54
January 22, 2003
- Re: Hidden body html text, David W. Tamkin, 22:10
- Re: Hidden body html text, Tony L. Svanstrom, 22:01
- Re: Hidden body html text, Jefferis Peterson, 21:28
- Re: date filtering of old messages, Alan Clifford, 13:33
- Re: date filtering of old messages, LuKreme, 13:18
- Re: YAVR (Yet Another Virus Recipe) :-), Nikos K. Kantarakias, 11:04
- Internal IP address obfuscation?, Chris Santerre, 08:09
- Re: date filtering of old messages, Mike Peeler, 04:56
- Re: date filtering of old messages, Lars Hecking, 04:49
- date filtering of old messages, pierre, 04:20
January 21, 2003
- Re: Is this just a bad idea? How do you write to a lmtp socket?, Professional Software Engineering, 19:34
- Is this just a bad idea? How do you write to a lmtp socket?, Hans Christensen, 18:35
- Re: Strange Truth > Fiction, David W. Tamkin, 17:47
- Re: Strange >From (was: Re: what means the parameters Y, d and T), Professional Software Engineering, 17:20
- Re: Strange >From (was: Re: what means the parameters Y, d and T), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 16:50
- Re: Strange >From (was: Re: what means the parameters Y, d and T), LuKreme, 16:06
- Re: Strange >From (was: Re: what means the parameters Y, d and T), LuKreme, 15:55
- getting procmail to run with my groups, Jeff Orrok, 15:46
- Re: Strange >From (was: Re: what means the parameters Y, d and T), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 14:43
- Re: Strange >From, Professional Software Engineering, 14:13
- Re: Strange >From, David W. Tamkin, 12:18
- Re: Strange >From (was: Re: what means the parameters Y, d and T), Don Hammond, 12:10
- Can procmail write to lmtp socket?, Hans Christensen, 11:59
- Re: Strange >From (was: Re: what means the parameters Y, d and T), Professional Software Engineering, 11:34
- Re: Strange >From (was: Re: what means the parameters Y, d and T), fleet, 11:20
- Re: Strange >From (was: Re: what means the parameters Y, d and T), Professional Software Engineering, 10:35
- Re: Strange >From (was: Re: what means the parameters Y, d and T), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 09:20
- Re: Strange >From (was: Re: what means the parameters Y, d and T), Jim Correia, 07:58
- Re: what means the parameters Y, d and T, Tony L. Svanstrom, 07:18
- Strange >From (was: Re: what means the parameters Y, d and T), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 07:18
- Re: what means the parameters Y, d and T, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 06:43
- what means the parameters Y, d and T, VIVES Ariel, 06:14
- Sendmail > procmail > cyrusv2(/var/imap/socket/lmtp), Hans Christensen, 00:48
January 20, 2003
- Re: MATCH problem, LuKreme, 15:59
- Re: extracting the date, LuKreme, 15:45
- Re: safe writing to spool, Gary, 15:02
- Re: safe writing to spool, Mike Peeler, 14:24
- Re: No good spamming bastards are using new tricks to get by the filters, dman, 13:11
- safe writing to spool, Rice, Kevin, 12:24
- Re: No good spamming bastards are using new tricks to get by the filters, Louis LeBlanc, 12:03
- Re: MATCH problem, Bart Schaefer, 11:35
- Re: No good spamming bastards are using new tricks to get by the filters, dman, 11:22
- Re: No good spamming bastards are using new tricks to get by the filters, procmail, 11:09
- Re: No good spamming bastards are using new tricks to get by the filters, Tony L. Svanstrom, 11:09
- Re: MATCH problem, Nancy McGough, 11:09
- Re: No good spamming bastards are using new tricks to get by the filters, Mike Peeler, 10:36
- RE: extracting the date, Dallman Ross, 10:22
- Re: No good spamming bastards are using new tricks to get by the filters, Tony L. Svanstrom, 10:22
- Re: No good spamming bastards are using new tricks to get by the filters, LuKreme, 10:22
- Re: No good spamming bastards are using new tricks to get by the filters, Mike Peeler, 03:16
- Re: No good spamming bastards are using new tricks to get by the filters, dman, 03:00
- Re: No good spamming bastards are using new tricks to get by the filters, dman, 03:00
- Re: No good spamming bastards are using new tricks to get by the filters, LuKreme, 03:00
- Re: No good spamming bastards are using new tricks to get by the filters, Tony L. Svanstrom, 00:11
January 19, 2003
- Re: No good spamming bastards are using new tricks to get by the filters, David W. Tamkin, 23:09
- Re: No good spamming bastards are using new tricks to get by the filters, Louis LeBlanc, 22:42
- Re: No good spamming bastards are using new tricks to get by the filters, Tony L. Svanstrom, 22:17
- Re: No good spamming bastards are using new tricks to get by the filters, Zack Brown, 21:14
- Re: No good spamming bastards are using new tricks to get by the filters, Tony L. Svanstrom, 20:48
- Re: No good spamming bastards are using new tricks to get by the filters, Louis LeBlanc, 20:03
- Re: MATCH problem, fleet, 19:54
- Re: No good spamming bastards are using new tricks to get by the filters, Louis LeBlanc, 19:34
- Re: MATCH problem, LuKreme, 18:02
- Re: No good spamming bastards are using new tricks to get by the filters, LuKreme, 17:56
- Re: MATCH problem, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 17:19
- Re: MATCH problem, fleet, 14:47
- Re: MATCH problem, Professional Software Engineering, 13:49
- Re: MATCH problem, Bart Schaefer, 13:29
- Re: MATCH problem, fleet, 12:34
- Re: MATCH problem, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 12:24
- Re: MATCH problem, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 11:43
- Re: MATCH problem, Bart Schaefer, 11:38
- No good spamming bastards are using new tricks to get by the filters, Louis LeBlanc, 11:28
- Re: MATCH problem, fleet, 08:35
- Re: MATCH problem, Professional Software Engineering, 00:36
January 18, 2003
- Re: Default to Maildir, Gary, 18:50
- MATCH problem, fleet, 18:32
- Re: extracting the date, LuKreme, 13:55
- Re: Similar question on hidden text, Holger Wahlen, 13:55
- Re: Similar question on hidden text, Charles Gregory, 13:02
- Default to Maildir, Odhiambo Washington, 12:43
- Re: The From separator in mbox files is being lost, Andrew Morton, 12:37
- Re: extracting the date, Tony L. Svanstrom, 12:16
- Re: extracting the date, Professional Software Engineering, 11:35
- Re: extracting the date, David W. Tamkin, 09:30
- Re: extracting the date, dman, 09:09
- extracting the date, LuKreme, 08:47
January 17, 2003
- perl script, Mike Peeler, 20:57
- Re: The From separator in mbox files is being lost, Martin McCarthy, 20:23
- Re: The From separator in mbox files is being lost, Andrew Morton, 12:33
- Re: The From separator in mbox files is being lost, LuKreme, 07:19
- mailstat v0.8 is there, Max J. Werner, 03:50
- About saving attachments, glambr, 02:12
- Dropping $HOME, Daniellek, 01:44
- The From separator in mbox files is being lost, Andrew Morton, 01:01
January 16, 2003
- Re: newbie question, Andrew Edelstein, 17:07
- Re: Stripping multiple lines out of Body, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 16:45
- Re: Stripping multiple lines out of Body, Bart Schaefer, 16:36
- Re: newbie question, Professional Software Engineering, 16:26
- Re: Stripping multiple lines out of Body, LuKreme, 16:17
- Re: newbie question, dman, 16:11
- Re: [procmail] newbie question, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 16:07
- Re: newbie question, Tony L. Svanstrom, 16:01
- Re: Stripping multiple lines out of Body, LuKreme, 15:53
- Re: Stripping multiple lines out of Body, LuKreme, 15:48
- newbie question, Michele Francis, 15:35
- Re: sed's and body content filter, dman, 15:28
- Re: Summary Re: Best practices: .forward and .procmailrc?, Professional Software Engineering, 14:02
- Re: sed's and body content filter, Bart Schaefer, 13:27
- Re: Summary Re: Best practices: .forward and .procmailrc?, Derek Simkowiak, 13:05
- RE: Can a recipe span lines?, Mike Kercher, 12:27
- Re: Can a recipe span lines?, Professional Software Engineering, 12:18
- Re: sed's and body content filter, dman, 12:06
- Re: Can a recipe span lines?, Paul Chvostek, 11:51
- Can a recipe span lines?, Mike Kercher, 11:31
- Re: sed's and body content filter, Bart Schaefer, 11:14
- Re: sed's and body content filter, dman, 10:50
- Re: sed's and body content filter, Bart Schaefer, 10:20
- Re: sed's and body content filter, Jefferis Peterson, 09:44
- Re: sed's and body content filter, dman, 09:33
- Re: Stripping multiple lines out of Body, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 09:33
- Re: sed's and body content filter, Jefferis Peterson, 08:52
- Re: Stripping multiple lines out of Body, Lars Hecking, 08:20
- Stripping multiple lines out of Body, LuKreme, 07:41
- Re: Summary Re: Best practices: .forward and .procmailrc?, LuKreme, 07:41
- Re: Procmail will not use a VAR as filename for mailbox, Lars Andersen, 01:52
- Re: Procmail will not use a VAR as filename for mailbox, Lars Andersen, 01:35
- Re: Procmail will not use a VAR as filename for mailbox, David W. Tamkin, 01:27
- Re: Procmail will not use a VAR as filename for mailbox, Lars Andersen, 00:42
January 15, 2003
- Re: strlen() in procmail, David W. Tamkin, 19:34
- Re: strlen() in procmail, Bart Schaefer, 17:27
- RE: strlen() in procmail, Dallman Ross, 17:23
- Re: strlen() in procmail, David W. Tamkin, 17:07
- Re: strlen() in procmail, David W. Tamkin, 16:54
- Re: strlen() in procmail, David W. Tamkin, 16:54
- Re: strlen() in procmail, Bart Schaefer, 16:14
- Re: Body search, Tony L. Svanstrom, 16:00
- Re: Body search, fleet, 15:51
- Re: Body search, Tony L. Svanstrom, 15:40
- Re: strlen() in procmail, dman, 15:35
- Re: strlen() in procmail, dman, 15:27
- Body search, Joel Wickard, 15:15
- Re: HELP! How can I decrypt encrypted messages?, Chuck Harding, 13:09
- Re: strlen() in procmail, David W. Tamkin, 13:05
- Re: Body content filter work on html alt content?, Professional Software Engineering, 12:35
- Re: HELP! How can I decrypt encrypted messages?, Professional Software Engineering, 12:28
- Re: HELP! How can I decrypt encrypted messages?, Chuck Harding, 12:00
- Re: strlen() in procmail, Bart Schaefer, 11:38
- Re: Body content filter work on html alt content?, dman, 11:38
- Re: Body content filter work on html alt content?, Jefferis Peterson, 11:30
- LINEBUF testing, fleet, 11:16
- Re: strlen() in procmail, David W. Tamkin, 10:18
- Re: Body content filter work on html alt content?, fleet, 10:13
- Re: Similar question on hidden text, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 10:13
- Re: Similar question on hidden text, Lars Hecking, 09:43
- Similar question on hidden text, Jefferis Peterson, 09:15
- Body content filter work on html alt content?, Jefferis Peterson, 09:05
- problems with attachment, Nandita Shenvi, 06:28
January 14, 2003
- Re: strlen() in procmail, Bart Schaefer, 23:17
- Re: strlen() in procmail, David W. Tamkin, 22:36
- Re: strlen() in procmail, David W. Tamkin, 22:13
- Re: strlen() in procmail, Bart Schaefer, 22:13
- Re: strlen() in procmail, Professional Software Engineering, 21:23
- Re: strlen() in procmail, Dallman Ross, 15:31
- strlen() in procmail, Bart Schaefer, 14:44
- Re: puzzled about a regexp, Nikos K. Kantarakias, 13:52
- RE: puzzled about a regexp, Dallman Ross, 12:30
- Re: puzzled about a regexp, procmail, 10:41
- Re: inconsistent routine to grab snippet of email, dman, 10:41
- inconsistent routine to grab snippet of email, mark david mcCreary, 08:01
- Re: Procmail will not use a VAR as filename for mailbox, dman, 06:46
- Re: puzzled about a regexp, dman, 04:39
- Re: puzzled about a regexp, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 04:03
- Re: Procmail will not use a VAR as filename for mailbox, Lars Andersen, 01:58
January 13, 2003
- Re: HELP! How can I decrypt encrypted messages?, Professional Software Engineering, 22:02
- HELP! How can I decrypt encrypted messages?, Chuck Harding, 19:05
- RE: Checking Message-Id: cache without updating?, Dallman Ross, 19:05
- Re: help with scoring & size condition, David W. Tamkin, 18:34
- RE: help with scoring & size condition, Dallman Ross, 17:27
- Re: help with scoring & size condition, David W. Tamkin, 15:40
- Re: help with scoring & size condition, David W. Tamkin, 15:40
- Re: puzzled about a regexp, Nikos K. Kantarakias, 15:40
- Re: help with scoring & size condition, Matt Garretson, 15:40
- Re: puzzled about a regexp, procmail, 15:40
- Re: help with scoring & size condition, David W. Tamkin, 15:40
- Re: help with scoring & size condition, Holger Wahlen, 14:53
- RE: More Bouncing off of Infinity, Dallman Ross, 14:53
- Re: puzzled about a regexp, Professional Software Engineering, 12:52
- Re: generic matching for mailing lists..., Professional Software Engineering, 12:52
- RE: More Bouncing off of Infinity, Bart Schaefer, 12:50
- Re: Sendmail - Procmail - Mailertable, Professional Software Engineering, 12:50
- Re: puzzled about a regexp, dman, 12:03
- RE: help with scoring & size condition, Dallman Ross, 11:53
- Re: puzzled about a regexp, procmail, 11:37
- Re: [PROCMAIL] Summary Re: Best practices: .forward and .procmailrc?, Derek Simkowiak, 11:33
- Re: help with scoring & size condition, Martin McCarthy, 10:55
- Sendmail - Procmail - Mailertable, Grant Peel, 10:43
- Re: help with scoring & size condition, David W. Tamkin, 10:37
- Re: help with scoring & size condition, Matt Garretson, 10:07
- Re: [PROCMAIL] Summary Re: Best practices: .forward and .procmailrc?, Tony L. Svanstrom, 08:40
- Re: [PROCMAIL] Summary Re: Best practices: .forward and .procmailrc?, Michael Powe, 08:27
- Re: More Bouncing off of Infinity, dman, 06:28
- RE: More Bouncing off of Infinity, Dallman Ross, 06:09
- Re: More Bouncing off of Infinity, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 05:42
- Forward still send a copy, syslog, 05:27
- Re: Procmail will not use a VAR as filename for mailbox, dman, 05:09
- Procmail will not use a VAR as filename for mailbox, Lars Andersen, 04:46
- Re: display error message, Gerald Livingston, 04:15
- display error message, Stand H, 04:03
January 12, 2003
- Re: puzzled about a regexp, Nikos K. Kantarakias, 21:40
- Re: generic matching for mailing lists..., Professional Software Engineering, 20:34
- Re: generic matching for mailing lists..., Professional Software Engineering, 20:34
- Re: generic matching for mailing lists..., jonathon, 19:58
- Re: Can't unsubscribe, Charlie Summers, 19:30
- Checking Message-Id: cache without updating?, Christopher P. Lindsey, 19:05
- RE: fetchmail: SIGPIPE thrown from an MDA or a stream socket error, Dallman Ross, 17:16
- Re: Backup of messages ... Now what?, MostlyHarmlessnj, 17:07
- Re: puzzled about a regexp, Tony L. Svanstrom, 17:00
- Re: puzzled about a regexp, Nikos K. Kantarakias, 16:55
- Re: puzzled about a regexp, Nikos K. Kantarakias, 16:31
- RE: puzzled about a regexp, Dallman Ross, 16:17
- Re: puzzled about a regexp, Nikos K. Kantarakias, 16:17
- Re: puzzled about a regexp, Tony L. Svanstrom, 16:13
- More Bouncing off of Infinity, Dallman Ross, 16:06
- Re: puzzled about a regexp, Nikos K. Kantarakias, 15:46
- Re: puzzled about a regexp, Nikos K. Kantarakias, 15:41
- Re: Sending an html file in a procmail recipe, LuKreme, 14:38
- tripany.com vacation messages, Sean Straw / PSE, 13:25
- Re: adding missing Message-Id headers, Zack Brown, 13:05
- Re: adding missing Message-Id headers, dman, 12:50
- Re: generic matching for mailing lists..., dman, 12:42
- Re: generic matching for mailing lists..., Professional Software Engineering, 12:25
- Re: generic matching for mailing lists..., Professional Software Engineering, 12:18
- Re: adding missing Message-Id headers, Professional Software Engineering, 12:18
- Re: puzzled about a regexp, dman, 12:04
- Re: generic matching for mailing lists..., Zack Brown, 11:56
- adding missing Message-Id headers, Zack Brown, 11:49
- Re: Sending an html file in a procmail recipe, Bart Schaefer, 11:35
- Re: generic matching for mailing lists..., poff, 11:14
- generic matching for mailing lists..., Zack Brown, 09:22
- RE: procmail: Truncated file to former size, Afonso Infante, 09:00
- Re: puzzled about a regexp, Nikos K. Kantarakias, 08:49
- puzzled about a regexp, Nikos K. Kantarakias, 08:42
- Re: Sending an html file in a procmail recipe, Alan Clifford, 08:14
- Re: procmail: Truncated file to former size, ProcMailER, 08:01
- Re: procmail: Truncated file to former size, Santiago Vila, 06:55
- Sending an html file in a procmail recipe, LuKreme, 06:09
- procmail: Truncated file to former size, Afonso Infante, 05:23
- Re: Redux: killing list noise, dman, 03:24
January 11, 2003
- Re: Redux: killing list noise, David W. Tamkin, 21:43
- Redux: killing list noise, Dallman Ross, 18:17
- RE: help with scoring & size condition, Dallman Ross, 17:01
- Re: help with scoring & size condition, David W. Tamkin, 16:07
- RE: help with scoring & size condition, Dallman Ross, 15:12
- Re: help with scoring & size condition, David W. Tamkin, 13:38
- RE: help with scoring & size condition, Dallman Ross, 13:30
- Re: How is this one getting through?, Gerald V. Livingston II, 01:14
- Re: Can't unsubscribe, Greg Matheson, 00:48
January 10, 2003
- Re: How is this one getting through?, Jefferis Peterson, 23:31
- Re: How is this one getting through?, parv, 21:36
- Re: Can't unsubscribe, Greg Matheson, 21:13
- Re: Can't unsubscribe, Sean Straw / PSE, 21:03
- Re: Can't unsubscribe, Timothy J. Luoma, 20:26
- Re: Can't unsubscribe, Fuzzy Logic, 20:17
- Can't unsubscribe, Timothy J. Luoma, 20:05
- RE: How is this one getting through?, Jefferis Peterson, 18:20
- Re: help with scoring & size condition, Martin McCarthy, 17:38
- Re: help with scoring & size condition, dman, 16:15
- Re: help with scoring & size condition, dman, 16:09
- help with scoring & size condition, Matt Garretson, 15:53
- Re: How is this one getting through?, Don Hammond, 11:06
- Re: How is this one getting through?, dman, 10:56
- Re: How is this one getting through?, Martin McCarthy, 10:56
- Re: How is this one getting through?, Jefferis Peterson, 10:56
- Re: How is this one getting through?, procmail, 10:42
- Deconstructing supremum, Jefferis Peterson, 10:42
- How is this one getting through?, Jefferis Peterson, 10:06
- Re: global mail filter, Scott Wiersdorf, 07:50
- Re: Backup of messages ... Now what?, Martin McCarthy, 07:50
- OT: Was: Backup of messages ... Now what?, dman, 07:38
- Backup of messages ... Now what?, MostlyHarmlessnj, 06:18
- Re: Procmail Books, Mike Loiterman, 05:01
- Re: global mail filter, Samnang Tep, 03:34
January 09, 2003
- Re: global mail filter, Professional Software Engineering, 22:27
- global mail filter, Stand H, 21:36
- Re: Loop within ~/.procmailrc possible?, David W. Tamkin, 21:03
- Re: Summary Re: Best practices: .forward and .procmailrc?, Tony L. Svanstrom, 17:41
- Summary Re: Best practices: .forward and .procmailrc?, Derek Simkowiak, 17:21
- Re: Loop within ~/.procmailrc possible?, Ralph Müller, 15:38
- RE: Message Ids, Dallman Ross, 15:27
- Re: Hammond/Peterson are discussing,, procmail, 14:55
- Re: | vs. ? And another basic question, procmail, 14:43
- Re: Hammond/Peterson are discussing,, Jefferis Peterson, 13:46
- Re: | vs. ? And another basic question, dman, 13:38
- Re: Loop within ~/.procmailrc possible?, dman, 13:20
- Re: Loop within ~/.procmailrc possible?, Martin McCarthy, 13:01
- Re: Wiki (Was:: Procmail Books), Professional Software Engineering, 12:51
- Re: | vs. ? And another basic question, procmail, 12:44
- Re: Procmail Books, Nancy McGough, 12:32
- Re: Wiki (Was:: Procmail Books), Tony L. Svanstrom, 12:29
- Wiki (Was:: Procmail Books), Nancy McGough, 12:12
- Loop within ~/.procmailrc possible?, Ralph Müller, 12:12
- Re: Thanks and ANNOUNCE: mail configuration script, Don Hammond, 09:48
- [Fwd: Re: Procmail Books], Jostein Berntsen, 08:05
- Re: Procmail Books, Zack Brown, 07:38
- Re: Procmail Books, Mark T. Valites, 07:11
- Thanks and ANNOUNCE: mail configuration script, Marco Fioretti, 07:11
- Re: Procmail Books, Martin McCarthy, 05:36
- Re: | vs. ? And another basic question, dman, 04:59
- Incoming mail backup using hard links, Daniellek, 01:56
- posible bug: * ^To:[ ]Miernik[ ]<miernik(_at_)ctnet\(_dot_)pl> does not match, Miernik, 01:04
- Re: Best practices: .forward and .procmailrc?, Fred Morris, 00:57
- Re: Procmail Books, LuKreme, 00:45
- Re: Procmail Books, Zack Brown, 00:06
January 08, 2003
- Re: Problem filtering spamassasin tagged mail :(, Tony L. Svanstrom, 20:42
- Re: | vs. ? And another basic question, procmail, 20:42
- Re: Forged headers detection, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 20:42
- Re: YAVR (Yet Another Virus Recipe) :-), Nikos K. Kantarakias, 17:56
- Re: Problem filtering spamassasin tagged mail :(, LuKreme, 17:19
- Re: | vs. ? And another basic question, Holger Wahlen, 17:19
- Best practices: .forward and .procmailrc?, Derek Simkowiak, 17:09
- Re: | vs. ? And another basic question, Don Hammond, 17:09
- Re: Disabling pipe execution, Alan Clifford, 13:57
- Re: Forged headers detection, poff, 13:04
- Re: Forged headers detection, Gerald Livingston, 12:53
- Re: Forged headers detection, Gary, 12:04
- Re: Forged headers detection, Professional Software Engineering, 11:51
- Re: Procmail Books, procmail, 11:46
- Re: Procmail Books, Mark_Saunders, 10:50
- Forged headers detection, Jefferis Peterson, 10:33
- Re: | vs. ? And another basic question, Jefferis Peterson, 08:57
- 50MB mailbox limit?, Jacek Wojaczynski, 07:41
- Re: Disabling pipe execution, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 03:49
- Re: ATTN ADMINS: Web Page needs unsubscribe instructions!, Chris Green, 02:20
- Re: ATTN ADMINS: Web Page needs unsubscribe instructions!, Chris Green, 02:09
- Re: ATTN ADMINS: Web Page needs unsubscribe instructions!, Chris De Young, 01:05
January 07, 2003
- Re: ATTN ADMINS: Web Page needs unsubscribe instructions!, Tony L. Svanstrom, 23:22
- Re: | vs. ? And another basic question, Don Hammond, 23:22
- Re: | vs. ? And another basic question, Don Hammond, 22:58
- Re: ATTN ADMINS: Web Page needs unsubscribe instructions!, Michael Powe, 22:39
- | vs. ? And another basic question, Jefferis Peterson, 19:10
- Re: Disabling pipe execution, Scott Wiersdorf, 17:12
- Re: Disabling pipe execution, Derek Simkowiak, 17:07
- Re: virtual mail rules, Professional Software Engineering, 16:53
- Re: Problem filtering spamassasin tagged mail :(, Professional Software Engineering, 16:50
- Re: Disabling pipe execution, Scott Wiersdorf, 16:32
- Disabling pipe execution, Derek Simkowiak, 14:56
- Re: ATTN ADMINS: Web Page needs unsubscribe instructions!, Charles Gregory, 14:46
- Re: ATTN ADMINS: Web Page needs unsubscribe instructions!, Charles Gregory, 14:46
- Re: Problem filtering spamassasin tagged mail :(, poff, 14:30
- Re: ATTN ADMINS: Web Page needs unsubscribe instructions!, Stan Ryckman, 14:01
- Re: ATTN ADMINS: Web Page needs unsubscribe instructions!, dman, 13:53
- ATTN ADMINS: Web Page needs unsubscribe instructions!, Charles Gregory, 13:33
- Procmail Books, Mike Loiterman, 12:45
- Re: Variable Usage (was: Problem filtering spamassasin tagged mail :(), procmail, 11:35
- Re: YAVR (Yet Another Virus Recipe) :-), Nikos K. Kantarakias, 07:31
- Re: virtual mail rules, Stelios Asmargianakis, 07:17
- Re: Problem filtering spamassasin tagged mail :(, dman, 05:37
- Re: Problem filtering spamassasin tagged mail :(, procmail, 04:08
- Re: fetchmail: SIGPIPE thrown from an MDA or a stream socket error, dman, 03:18
- Re: Problem filtering spamassasin tagged mail :(, dman, 03:18
- fetchmail: SIGPIPE thrown from an MDA or a stream socket error, LuKreme, 02:20
- Re: filtering to my inbox *and* each mailing list's file, LuKreme, 01:41
- Re: Problem filtering spamassasin tagged mail :(, LuKreme, 01:41
January 06, 2003
- Re: DEFAULT problem, Scott Stark, 22:47
- My page about procmail; comments needed., Tony L. Svanstrom, 21:17
- My page about procmail; comments needed., Tony L. Svanstrom, 21:17
- Re: filtering to my inbox *and* each mailing list's file, Zack Brown, 20:55
- Re: filtering to my inbox *and* each mailing list's file, Professional Software Engineering, 19:13
- Re: TO UNSUBSCRIBE READ THIS! (Was: please remove my address), ProcMailER, 17:46
- Re: filtering to my inbox *and* each mailing list's file, dman, 17:21
- filtering to my inbox *and* each mailing list's file, Zack Brown, 17:00
- RE: TO UNSUBSCRIBE READ THIS! (Was: please remove my address), Chris Santerre, 15:49
- Re: TO UNSUBSCRIBE READ THIS! (Was: please remove my address), Charlie Summers, 15:31
- Re: TO UNSUBSCRIBE READ THIS! (Was: please remove my address), Tony L. Svanstrom, 15:31
- Re: TO UNSUBSCRIBE READ THIS! (Was: please remove my address), dman, 14:51
- Re: Problem filtering spamassasin tagged mail :(, poff, 14:46
- Re: Problem filtering spamassasin tagged mail :(, Professional Software Engineering, 14:46
- Re: Problem filtering spamassasin tagged mail :(, Bart Schaefer, 14:21
- Re: virtual mail rules, Professional Software Engineering, 14:02
- Re: please remove my address, Professional Software Engineering, 14:02
- Problem filtering spamassasin tagged mail :(, poff, 13:56
- Re: TO UNSUBSCRIBE READ THIS! (Was: please remove my address), Danny Horne, 13:56
- TO UNSUBSCRIBE READ THIS! (Was: please remove my address), Charlie Summers, 13:28
- Re: generic executable recipes go to trash?, Tony L. Svanstrom, 12:20
- please remove my address, Lara Santos, 11:50
- Re: generic executable recipes go to trash?, procmail, 11:43
- virtual mail rules, Stelios Asmargianakis, 11:43
- Re: generic executable recipes go to trash?, Nikos K. Kantarakias, 09:43
- Re: generic executable recipes go to trash?, Tony L. Svanstrom, 08:52
- generic executable recipes go to trash?, Nikos K. Kantarakias, 06:17
- please unsubscribe me, thanks!, Matrix_pk, 00:33
January 05, 2003
- Re: "domain.tld" from From:-headline, Joerg Frings-Fuerst, 23:29
- Re: please remove my address, ProcMailER, 21:18
- please remove my address, Brian Simpson, 20:57
- dmail, mbx format, w flag, and understanding deliveredness, Jim Correia, 19:41
- Re: "domain.tld" from From:-headline, Alan Clifford, 17:20
- Re: "domain.tld" from From:-headline, dman, 17:00
- Re: Decoding inline base64; a working solution for you to trash. =), Tony L. Svanstrom, 16:21
- "domain.tld" from From:-headline, Joerg Frings-Fuerst, 16:04
- Re: DEFAULT problem, Professional Software Engineering, 13:22
- YAVR (Yet Another Virus Recipe) :-), Nikos K. Kantarakias, 13:22
- DEFAULT problem, Scott Stark, 11:05
- mbx dmail procmailrc, Faraz Kohari, 03:06
- Re: Message Ids, LuKreme, 01:19
January 04, 2003
- Re: Message Ids, Paul Chvostek, 22:43
- Re: Message Ids, Paul Chvostek, 22:30
- The most useless procmailrecipe-award - and the nominated are..., Tony L. Svanstrom, 21:10
- Re: Message Ids, Andrew Edelstein, 14:53
- Decoding inline base64; a working solution for you to trash. =), Tony L. Svanstrom, 13:02
- Re: [Procmail] Re: Autoresponse based on email address, Mark T. Valites, 12:30
- Re: [Procmail] Re: Autoresponse based on email address, dman, 11:49
- Re: Message Ids, Professional Software Engineering, 11:46
- Re: [Procmail] Re: Autoresponse based on email address, Mark T. Valites, 11:40
- Re: Message Ids, Alan Clifford, 11:18
- Re: Message Ids, Bart Schaefer, 11:11
- Re: W32/Yaha-K recipe?, Paul Chvostek, 10:15
- Re: Message Ids, Paul Chvostek, 10:11
- Re: Message Ids, dman, 04:35
- problem when using the '-p' flag, Bob Smith, 03:54
- Re: Message Ids, LuKreme, 03:35
January 03, 2003
- Re: Autoresponse based on email address, Scott Wiersdorf, 22:35
- Re: filter spam in body, but not mime?, David J. Weller-Fahy, 22:25
- Re: Autoresponse based on email address, Alan Clifford, 20:06
- Filtering on SMTP relay mailserver, Samnang Tep, 18:54
- Re: Autoresponse based on email address, David W. Tamkin, 18:24
- Proper forwarding syntax?, Jefferis Peterson, 17:50
- Re: [Procmail] Re: Autoresponse based on email address, Ashley M. Kirchner, 17:44
- Re: [Procmail] Re: Autoresponse based on email address, Scott Wiersdorf, 17:30
- Re: [Procmail] Re: Autoresponse based on email address, Ashley M. Kirchner, 17:22
- W32/Yaha-K recipe?, scott, 16:58
- filter spam in body, but not mime?, PGomez, 15:45
- Re: [Procmail] Re: Autoresponse based on email address, Scott Wiersdorf, 15:07
- Re: [Procmail] Re: Autoresponse based on email address, Ashley M. Kirchner, 14:59
- Re: [procmail] any good `mime' regex's ?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 14:39
- Re: Autoresponse based on email address, Scott Wiersdorf, 14:15
- Re: How to block a range of IP's?, Stan Ryckman, 14:05
- Autoresponse based on email address, Ashley M. Kirchner, 13:53
- MSN Uniq X-Field ??, S Semple, 13:45
- Re: any good `mime' regex's ?, J., 10:52
- Re: procmail ver 3.15, Greg Matheson, 05:07
- Re: any good `mime' regex's ?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 03:59
- procmail ver 3.15, Shashikanth, 01:44
- any good `mime' regex's ?, J., 00:16
January 02, 2003
- Re: How to block a range of IP's?, Peter H. Coffin, 22:53
- Re: How to block a range of IP's?, Peter H. Coffin, 21:49
- Re: How to block a range of IP's?, Stan Ryckman, 20:57
- Re: How to block a range of IP's?, Jefferis Peterson, 18:44
- Re: Procmail isn't matching when it should (Redhat 8.0), Graham Freeman, 16:41
- RE: procmail blues: half-shod solution..., Dallman Ross, 11:53
- Re: procmail blues: half-shod solution..., poff, 11:24
- Re: Executing an external program from procmail, dman, 11:24
- Re: Executing an external program from procmail, Peter Fekkes, 11:24
- Executing an external program from procmail, Jeff Borders, 09:02
- Re: Which mailbox a mail gets sent to? (like "insert_id"), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 08:09
- Which mailbox a mail gets sent to? (like "insert_id"), poff, 06:28
January 01, 2003
- Re: whaaa??, Tom Allison, 14:21
- Re: whaaa??, Peter H. Coffin, 12:39
- Re: Store and Run Script, Holger Wahlen, 10:40
- Re: whaaa??, Tom Allison, 09:09
- whaaa??, Tom Allison, 08:57
- Re: procmail blues: half-shod solution..., poff, 07:17
- Re: still stuck, dman, 06:27