On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Professional Software Engineering wrote:
Using grep? Sure, see the manpages for it (search for "repetition" operator):
[0-9]{5}
Thanks. I knew I had seen something somewhere!
Using procmail? Not in the same fashion, because it doesn't support all
the extended regexps (or the POSIX-style character class definitions, which
would be nice). But, you can use macros if you have a limited number of
variations to deal with:
And, again, thanks. I hadn't thought of that. I've broken the "form" up
into three parts so I now have:
* ^Message-ID:[ ]*<$PART1\$$PART2\$$PART3
Much easier to mess with. (I take it the "<" in this instance doesn't
cause problems?)
Possibly. More likely is that all the spew was simply sent using the same
tool.
And dman's comment about the X-Mailer tag adds to that probability.
I've set this recipe to send results to a separate mailbox where I can
watch it a little closer.
- fleet -
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail