At 18:59 2003-01-12 +0100, poff(_at_)sixbit(_dot_)org wrote:
:0H:
* ? egrep -i "Listar|majordomo|List-Id:|Precedence: list"
lists
Uh, why are you running egrep to do this? Seems like a monumental waste of
cpu cycles.
I'm curious (Still learning) - do you get mail like:
poff.sixbit.org/poff.sixbit.org.2002-12
Or is the "from" the mailing list in all cases, so you'd get:
procmail(_at_)Lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE/procmail(_at_)Lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE(_dot_)2002-12
Why not evaluate the conditions his recipe? Or heck, RUN IT IN A SANDBOX
ON YOUR OWN EMAIL.
procmail/procmail.2003-01
Or does it stop at the @ (what is the _+ for in your regexp? is that sort
ofa wildcard thing?)
Might I recommend a good regexp book?
The [] encloses a character class - in this case, consisting of a dash, the
letters, numbers, underscore, and plus (the upper AND lowercase letter
specifications are unnecessary however, as I'll mention in a post I'll be
sending shortly). For certain reasons, dash needs to be at the front of
the specification if it is there.
Well anyway, hope my basic version helped!
Sadly, I suspect not -- he's trying to use the $MATCH construct to identify
the actual LISTNAME and use that for the file to dump that message into. I
doubt he wants ALL of his listmail in one folder.
Doesn't seem to for your headers, you could also do a case=by=case one
isntead (sender: lists.*)
Case-by-case is definatley not what he's looking to do.
---
Sean B. Straw / Professional Software Engineering
Procmail disclaimer: <http://www.professional.org/procmail/disclaimer.html>
Please DO NOT carbon me on list replies. I'll get my copy from the list.
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail