procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: QMQp

2003-03-01 12:28:32
Hmmmm.  I've been using:

* ^Received:[   ].*\/unknown (\[127\.0\.0\.1]|\[10\.21\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+])
for 10.21.xx.xx.

Thanks for the tip on "private address space."

                                - fleet -

PS:  Sent inadvertently off-list.  Getting old.

On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Dallman Ross wrote:


On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 08:14:21AM -0600, Joel Wickard wrote:
I can't seem to come up with a rule to catch mail from 10.0.1.x, it
just never seems to work.

While it certainly would help in the advice department actually
to see what it is that you tried that doesn't work, I can tell
you right now that you don't want to filter on 10.0.x.x address
space.  That is part of the set of private address space that
anyone can use for local intranet communication.  Suggest
you look up "private address space" (with the quotes) on Google
or any other search engine.  Or start with RFC 1918, e.g., here:
http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/cgi-bin/rfc/rfc1918.html




_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • QMQp, Joel Wickard
    • Re: QMQp, Dallman Ross
      • Re: QMQp, fleet <=