LuKreme wrote:
On Tuesday, May 27, 2003, at 21:11 Canada/Mountain, Ricky Buchanan wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
* !^Precedence:(.*\<)(bulk|list|junk)
* !^X-Loop:(.*\<)furball(_at_)kitty(_dot_)com
Idle curiosity: Why do you put the .*\< in brackets? Isn't that
totally a do-nothing thing, since brackets are only used in procmail
basically for presenting alternatives (like in the first quoted line)
and you're not presenting any alternatives.
the (.*\<) is superior to a straight .* for a number of reasons, all of
which have been done to death on the list
That was not my question. My question was what is the technical
difference between
.*\<
and
(.*\<)
Unless you are going to write (.*\<)? - in which case the brackets are
required - I don't see why you put them in.
Also, parentheses () are not brackets [].
Go back to your Jargon File and look up "Commonwealth Hackish". I'm
from Australia.
Regards,
Ricky&
--
: Usual state: (e) None of the above.
: rb(_at_)tertius(_dot_)net(_dot_)au http://tertius.net.au/~rb/
: Innovation and invention are what happen when someone makes a
: conscious effort to ignore accepted limits. -- Homesteader
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail