Note that I extract the Subject to a variable, and leading whitespace is
blasted in that process (see examples of extraction in my sandbox). This
rule simply builds upon my spammishness model - alone, this characteristic
isn't enough to ditch a message as spam, but it helps to elevate the
message as junk when other factors are considered.
# 20030712/1349 SBS
# Re: at beginning of subject, but no associated headers
# (only counts as contributory - there's enough bozos out there that send
# new messages with Re:)
# one or both of the references type headers will cause the rule to fail.
:0
* SUBJECT ?? ^Re:
* 1^0
* -1^0 ^References:
* -1^0 ^In-Reply-To:
{
SPAMVAL="+35"
SPAMMISHNESS="${SPAMMISHNESS}${SPAMVAL}"
SPAMNOTES="${SPAMNOTES}SPAM: ${SPAMVAL} Re: subject without associated
references headers${NL}"
}
---
Sean B. Straw / Professional Software Engineering
Procmail disclaimer: <http://www.professional.org/procmail/disclaimer.html>
Please DO NOT carbon me on list replies. I'll get my copy from the list.
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail