[once again, this followup posted only to the procmail list]
At 11:27 2003-08-19 -0500, Chris Barnes wrote:
[big snip]
but alas, this appears to be the wrong syntax (fyi: -d
and --remove-markup are the same).
I refrained pointing out that the functionality of --remove-markup could
possibly be limited to removing the markup form as the local system is
configured to add it - so if you use [spam], but your upline ISP uses
*****SPAM*****, your local config might not be able to do the job. That's
just a guess - after all, this list is about procmail not SpamAssassin, and
I don't use SA.
If the purely PROCMAIL solutions which have already been posted don't work
for you, and a CORRECT invocation of SA in markup cleaning mode doesn't do
it locally, I must wonder if you can't simply run SA at your upline ISP to
remove the tags before depositing the messages in your mailbox there.
Then, at 10:49 2003-08-19 -0600, LuKreme (List User Kreme) wrote:
On Tuesday, Aug 19, 2003, at 10:27 Canada/Mountain, Chris Barnes wrote:
DROPPRIVS=yes
:0fhw
* ^X-Spam-
| "/usr/bin/spamassassin -d"
Why the "'s?
Probably because someone expects that to run a program named:
"/usr/bin/spamassassin -d"
instead of a program named:
/usr/bin/spamassassin
with an argument of:
-d
also, why the h?
I dunno, how about because the tweaks to the HEADERS are only in the
HEADERS, and thus only the HEADERS need to be filtered (why take the
processing hit for the body)? While the quotes no doubt are introducing
problems (which should show up in the VERBOSE LOGFILE, but you'd only know
that if you ran tests and bothered to inspect the logfile), the 'h' flag
would seem wholly appropriate.
---
Sean B. Straw / Professional Software Engineering
Procmail disclaimer: <http://www.professional.org/procmail/disclaimer.html>
Please DO NOT carbon me on list replies. I'll get my copy from the list.
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail