At 13:03 2003-10-16 +0200, Dallman Ross wrote:
I find it rather ridiculous to put this list mail through
SpamAssassin and reject posts that trigger its positive
evaluation.
Ok, I'd agree that on a list such as this one, that probably doesn't work
well, but then your message didn't bounce because of content.
Moreover, we have not had a dependable list moderator for quite
some time (as in, about a year). I don't know if the message
that I spent forty minutes creating is ever going to be
published to this list or not.
Well, it's not really a moderator, since the list messages don't generally
go through a moderation process. Messages with "issues" having to be
approved is somewhat different, and yes, I recognize that the admin tasked
with this isn't around as often as listmembers might hope, however, I know
from my administrative duties on some other lists that it can sap a lot
from you keeping on top of other peoples' problems.
I don't receive the list bounces (thankfully), but I've been in contact
with the list admin last month to contend with a recurring problem that
affects us all - nimrods who auto-reply to list posts, and as a result,
Phillip and I both have the proverbial keys to the list to attend to
problems when we see something amiss. Seeing as Phillip isn't around
often, if you've got a posting problem, let me know and I'll check into it
(it's all done via the web administrative interface).
Note that the listadmin interface has no controls for whether the list is
affected by SpamAssassin, which appears to be a server-level implementation.
BTW, there's an _option_, though not enabled, to convert all posts to
text/plain... MUST...RESIST...URGE...TO...TWEAK.
> The reason it is being held:
>
> Message has a suspicious header
Implies there was something wrong with the headers of your message. Upon
checking, it seems probable that it is because your message was relayed by
a host in a certain DNSBL.
Note that I locally filtered out the original message to which you were
replying (which was multipart/mixed, and matched other characteristics).
I no longer have the email address of the original poster
to whom I have replied, Jacoub Sbaiti, so I hope either my
post gets published or he sees this message.
I've gone ahead and approved the message to the list, which should have
arrived sometime before this reply.
---
Sean B. Straw / Professional Software Engineering
Procmail disclaimer: <http://www.professional.org/procmail/disclaimer.html>
Please DO NOT carbon me on list replies. I'll get my copy from the list.
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail