Message: 1
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:59:57 -0400
From: Louis Proyect <lnp3(_at_)columbia(_dot_)edu>
Subject: RE: Base64spam eliminated!
To: procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
Message-ID:
<200509221459(_dot_)j8MExwZk017934(_at_)serrano(_dot_)cc(_dot_)columbia(_dot_)edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
I have a literary account of my struggle with base64 spam at:
http://unrepentant.blogspot.com/
It prompted this comment:
You might want to look at moving away from Procmail recipes and SpamAssassin
to a pure Bayesian filter [PG's Plan For Spam]. Base64 encoding becomes a
spam-indicator if you get Base64 spam and no legitimate email Base64
encoded.
If you want a working version (with Bayesian noise reduction!) check out
DSpam.
(Full disclosure: I did a degree dissertation and project on Bayesian
filtering for spam killing).
Max | Email | Homepage | 09.22.05 - 9:00 am | #
It does not seem to have been packaged for debian yet. Also, I'm not
clear how it integrates with text-based projects such as Mutt.
Adam Bogacki,
afb(_at_)paradise(_dot_)net(_dot_)nz
----------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail
End of procmail Digest, Vol 32, Issue 14
****************************************
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail