My server was falsed listed on just 1 RBL whereas the every other RBL did
list me. I had a few people I could not send to until I removed my server.
So in my mind, there are two major problems with RBLs:
1. An RBL gets a new entry but does not bother to consult with it's peer RBL
lists before listing it.
2. A mail server should not reject email if 95% of the RBLs says there's not
a problem. In other words, don't just go by 1 RBL says.
-eric wood
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ruud H.G. van Tol" <rvtol(_at_)isolution(_dot_)nl>
It is a special combination of checks.
See the article that the list came from:
http://www.wrightthisway.com/Articles/cat_postfix.html
I use these 3:
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
reject_rbl_client cn.rbl.cluecentral.net
reject_rbl_client kr.rbl.cluecentral.net
That and SA takes care or my spam.
I use a few more:
cbl.abuseat.org R
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org R
list.dsbl.org R
dynablock.njabl.org R
dnsbl.njabl.org R
korea.services.net T
dnsbl.sorbs.net T
l1.spews.dnsbl.sorbs.net T
bl.spamcop.net T
virbl.dnsbl.bit.nl T
R=Reject, T=Tag.
The tagged ones I process further in procmail. The tagged's that aren't
tagged with spamcop, I report there.
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail