procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: formail treated as folder?

2006-07-10 16:36:12
On 7/10/06, Dallman Ross <dman(_at_)nomotek(_dot_)com> wrote:
Finally, your conditions seem silly to me.  Why have a condition that
says to look for a "YES", then have a second condition that says to
look for the absense of a "NO"?  I would think you could do the whole
thing with only one condition, better formulated.

What if there are two X-Spam-Status headers, one saying YES and other NO?

The test is still questionable -- why would you believe the NO header
in the presence of another one that says YES? -- but it's not
nonsensical.

____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list   Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>