On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 04:34:48PM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote:
On 7/10/06, Dallman Ross <dman(_at_)nomotek(_dot_)com> wrote:
Finally, your conditions seem silly to me. Why have a
condition that says to look for a "YES", then have a second
condition that says to look for the absense of a "NO"? I would
think you could do the whole thing with only one condition,
better formulated.
What if there are two X-Spam-Status headers, one saying YES and
other NO?
The test is still questionable -- why would you believe the NO
header in the presence of another one that says YES? -- but it's
not nonsensical.
I agree that it's not nonsensical. That's why you won't find
anywhere where I said "nonsensical." (Only "silly.") :-)
(And I said "seem" on purpose. Could have said "are silly," but I
backed off from that.)
dman
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail