On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:34:54 -0600 "David W. Tamkin"
<dattier(_at_)panix(_dot_)com>
wrote:
Gerald,
So did my suggestion work or not?
David is correct,
Correct with my recommendation, or correct ony that Dallman's wouldn't
do the job?
-e was not needed. It's working on less than 200 messages
It's working as in it's succeeding, or it's working as in it's
attempting to operate?
Correct as in working as I intended and succeeding. "Working on" as in
"processing" under 200 messages in the current set. Will see if -e is
needed later when I go after a set of non-spam that is 10 times larger.
Thanks,
Gerald
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail