procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LASTFOLDER blues

2007-03-27 01:57:54
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:47:35PM -0400, Mike Peeler wrote:
There's a lesson here: show us your code.  Don't describe it and don't
analyze it.  Or, feel free to describe and analyze--after you show it.

$ wc -l rc.*
  143 rc.init
 1190 rc.maillists
   88 rc.maillistsadmin
  298 rc.main
   98 rc.newsgroups
   68 rc.personal
   80 rc.persons-C++
  106 rc.persons-defaults
   82 rc.persons-DESY
  147 rc.persons-other
  112 rc.persons-physik
  105 rc.persons-private
   82 rc.persons-ZIB-ZEDAT
   42 rc.template
   21 rc.testing
 2662 total

If you had ever tested your idea, you'd have found out otherwise.  But
you didn't see there was anything to test--a different interpretation.

Let me see, the oldest mail I have from this archive is indeed 10
years old:

On Wed, Apr 30, 1997 at 02:42:02PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
| Hello,
| 
| I am trying to set up some complicated (for me) procmail rules. [...]

So, no, I'm not en passant trying to be a smartass. I've been
hammering on procmail recipes for a decade now.

It never even occurred to you that these people, smart people, who are
rarely wrong, at least not in public, might have learned anything that
you didn't already know better--because you after all really did RTFM.

I didn't blame anyone of not being smart or whatever, please don't put
words in my mouth. And the documentation vs code deficiencies are a
fact, there is nothing to be right or wrong about.

Here's the truth.  Not some claim.  Not some quote from the man pages.

The truth is that an fs issue nuked half a day of my mail which should
not happen. And the truth is: If you want to have multiple deliveries
with different conditions/actions you need to manually do the error
checking on each recipe. We came as far as to all agree to that.

There is nothing more to resurrect from this. One can either succumb
and double the recipes, make some miracle to reinitiate procmail
development or let it r.i.p.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpF3YQaoIUfh.pgp
Description: PGP signature

____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list   Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>