* Bart Schaefer <barton(_dot_)schaefer(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
[2007:04:03:07:54:51-0700] scribed:
On 4/3/07, Michael D Schleif <mds(_at_)helices(_dot_)org> wrote:
What am I missing?
If the regular expression contains '^FROM_MAILER' it will be substi-
tuted by '(^(((Resent-)?(From|Sender)|X-Envelope-From):|>?From
)([^>]*[^((_dot_)%(_at_)a-z0-9])?(Post(ma(st(er)?|n)|office)|(send)?Mail(er)?
|daemon|mmdf|n?uucp|ops|r(esponse|oot)|(bbs\.)?smtp(error)?
|s(erv(ices?|er)|ystem)|A(dmin(istrator)?|MMGR))(([^).!:a-z0-9][-_a-
z0-9]*)?[%@>\t ][^<)]*(\(.*\).*)?)?$([^>]|$))' (a stripped down
version of '^FROM_DAEMON'), which should catch mails coming from most
mailer-daemons.
The mail you're trying to catch is not coming from a mailer-daemon.
Why are you using FROM_MAILER at all?
Yes, I know. In fact, this is where I started:
:0
* ^from:.*mr real estate wizard <noreply(_at_)mrrealestatewizard\(_dot_)com>
rei/
procmail: No match on "^from:.*mr real estate wizard
<noreply(_at_)mrrealestatewizard\(_dot_)com>"
NOTE: This is just one (1) of dozens of ^from: recipes that began
failing late last year.
OK, EUREKA !?!?
I found that several (maybe, ALL?) of these have double quotation (")
marks in the ^From: header; which, of course, must be specially
considered ;>
Thank you.
:0
* ^From:.*mr real estate wizard
<noreply(_at_)mrrealestatewizard\(_dot_)com>
rei/
Although really
:0
* ^From:(_dot_)*(_at_)mrrealestatewizard\(_dot_)com
rei/
is probably enough.
--
Best Regards,
mds
-
Dare to fix things before they break . . .
-
Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much
we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . .
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail