procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: formail header concatenation

2009-01-21 10:25:08
Per Jessen wrote Wednesday, January 21, 2009 15:59:

LuKreme wrote:

On 20-Jan-2009, at 01:54, Per Jessen wrote:

I'm sure this must have been spotted before, so maybe it's not a
problem
at all, but -

I see a difference in behaviour between 3.15 and 3.22 - in 3.15,
headers with tabs in the continuation line were correctly
concatenated, _including_ the tab.

INCORRECTLY.

 In 3.22, the tab is missing.

Is this expected behaviour?

Yes.

Okay.  It seems a little odd that words that were previously separated
by the newline are no longer separated once the lines have been
concatenated, but that's just my opinion.

I would like LuKreme to back up his assertion.  I have been meaning
to respond to your question, but have no time right now.  For the
moment I will add that I was unaware of the difference but have
been aware of a perhaps related bug, and I will detail it when I can
a bit later.  I do not agree with LuKreme's view on it at this time,
but could be persuaded with some evidence.

More later,
Dallman

____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list   Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail