LuKreme wrote:
On 21-Jan-2009, at 09:14, Per Jessen wrote:
Example header:
Received: from s1.example.com (s1.example.com [127.1.2.3])
<tab>by mail.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF0A9B2CB
<tab>for <alfons(_dot_)aaberg(_at_)enidan(_dot_)com>; Wed, 21 Jan 2009
16:20:56 +010
(CET)
is concatenated into:
Received: from louiswu4.enidan.ch (louiswu4.enidan.ch
[88.198.9.175])by mail.enidan.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
4BF0A9B2CBfor <per(_dot_)jessen(_at_)enidan(_dot_)com>; Wed, 21 Jan 2009
16:20:56
+0100 (CET)
Are you absolutely sure about that? I haven't done extensive
processing of Received headers in quite a while, but I certainly don't
recall running into that.
Yes, I'm certain - I was debugging some code/script a couple of days
ago, when I hit it. I'd upgraded a system from SUSE 8.2 to 10.3, and
suddenly some data extraction process stopped working. (formail got
upgraded from 3.15 to 3.22 in that OS upgrade).
It's easily reproduced - you've probably done that already. If not,
I'll be happy to provide you a couple of sample emails :-)
best regards
Per Jessen
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail