procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: formail header concatenation

2009-01-21 17:28:37
Per Jessen wrote:
I'm sure this must have been spotted before, so maybe it's not a problem
at all, but -
I see a difference in behaviour between 3.15 and 3.22 - in 3.15, headers
with tabs in the continuation line were correctly concatenated,
_including_ the tab. In 3.22, the tab is missing.
Is this expected behaviour?

AFAIK, the first whitespace character after the newline should be discarded, because it is the functional whitespace. In this way you can have a break inside long strings without any embedded whitespace.

--
Ruud
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list   Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>