LuKreme wrote:
On 21-Jan-2009, at 15:27, Ruud H.G. van Tol wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
I'm sure this must have been spotted before, so maybe it's not a problem
at all, but - I see a difference in behaviour between 3.15 and 3.22 -
in 3.15, headers
with tabs in the continuation line were correctly concatenated,
_including_ the tab. In 3.22, the tab is missing. Is this expected
behaviour?
AFAIK, the first whitespace character after the newline should be
discarded, because it is the functional whitespace. In this way you
can have a break inside long strings without any embedded whitespace.
But in that case it seems the header should be folded <CRLF><TAB><SPACE>
or <SPACE><CRLF><TAB> in the first place.
It appears that it isn't, but I still think that it should. :)
(in the (common) case that there was a <SPACE> available to get a
<CRLF><SPACE-or-TAB> inserted before it)
--
Ruud
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail