Udi wrote (at 12:27 (+0300) on Thursday, 26th July, 2012):
But, the blank subject makes a mess in the inbox threads, so, I do
replay and ask for subject from the sender.
As this thread has changed from what was asked for to alternatives, I'd
like to say that your inbox threads should probably be better set to use
these items (these were taken from your message) for threading
References:
<201207241723(_dot_)q6OHN0Dv024493(_at_)trei(_dot_)professional(_dot_)org>
In-reply-to:
<201207241723(_dot_)q6OHN0Dv024493(_at_)trei(_dot_)professional(_dot_)org>
I see that Sean's email did not put in these headers so Sean's email
itself would be lost from the thread if there were no subject. So maybe
there should be a similar autoresponder asking for a proper In-reply-to
header?
If, once the threading problem has been solved, you still need a subject
header, why not use procmail to put one in, using something like "No
subject from Udi(_at_)example(_dot_)com"
Using an autoresponder is a bit of an overkill to solve the possibly
incorrect threading setup in your mail reader.
--
Alan
( Please address personal email to alan+1@ as email to lists@
is only read from my subscribed lists. )
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)de
http://mailman.rwth-aachen.de/mailman/listinfo/procmail