spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: going by message-id

2003-10-06 13:52:41
Meng Weng Wong <mengwong(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com> writes:

On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 12:02:48PM -0700, Ted Cabeen wrote:
| 
| Would something like a identd for mail work?  When a mail is received,
| you connect to the DNS-identified server of the sender, submit a
| messageid and a sender, and get a response as to whether that message
| id was sent by that sender?

mjd has proposed something like this.
  
http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com/200309/0017.html

Problem is, you don't get the Message-ID until DATA.

Even more radical is djb's Internet Mail 2000.
  http://cr.yp.to/im2000.html

The logical extreme is to modify 2821 to insert Habeas-style cookies!

And even then there's the spoofing problem --- a bad guy just reads off
the secret from some incoming mail, and forges using that secret.

True enough.  Ahh well.  

DJBs thing is quite radical indeed.  Hmmm.  Must think more.

-- 
Ted Cabeen           http://www.pobox.com/~secabeen            
ted(_at_)impulse(_dot_)net 
Check Website or Keyserver for PGP/GPG Key BA0349D2         
secabeen(_at_)pobox(_dot_)com
"I have taken all knowledge to be my province." -F. Bacon  
secabeen(_at_)cabeen(_dot_)org
"Human kind cannot bear very much reality."-T.S.Eliot        
cabeen(_at_)netcom(_dot_)com

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡