Re: SPF is only one component in a policy suite

On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 03:30:54PM -0400, Meng Weng Wong wrote:

     Example 2: if an SMTP receiver receives a message from a trusted
     client, such as a secondary MX for its own domain, SPF tests are
     not needed.


But it is still RECOMMENDED along with rewriting bounce addresses, no?

(that would hinder RFC acceptance though, as most MTAs don't support this
AFAIK)

Rob
-- 
Rob Kaper     | "In the name of sheer pity, won't someone operate on
cap(_at_)capsi(_dot_)com | Chairman Arafat and put that poor cancer into a 
cleaner
www.capsi.com | environment? -- Rick Brookhiser

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)½§ÅvÂ¼ð¦¾Øß´ëù1Ií-»Fqx(_dot_)com

pgpM9QYxsHTYW.pgp
Description: PGP signature