On Dec 18, 2003, at 9:02 AM, wayne wrote:
In <3FE1C7BD(_dot_)9040204(_at_)foster(_dot_)cc> Mark Foster
<mark(_at_)foster(_dot_)cc> writes:
Wouldn't doing away with the macro-char t (also) greatly reduce the
ddos risk?
What is t needed for, anyway?
Agreed. If I understand things correctly, the %t macro is only going
to be useful for DNS logging/tracking, but the timestamps in the logs
are going to be just as accurate.
It could be useful if you intentionally don't want lookups to be cached.
- ask
--
http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡