On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 01:45:18PM -0600, wayne wrote:
| In <E6193BA6-3182-11D8-85AC-000A957168EC(_at_)develooper(_dot_)com> Ask Bjørn
Hansen <ask(_at_)develooper(_dot_)com> writes:
|
| > On Dec 18, 2003, at 9:02 AM, wayne wrote:
| >
| >> In <3FE1C7BD(_dot_)9040204(_at_)foster(_dot_)cc> Mark Foster
<mark(_at_)foster(_dot_)cc> writes:
| >>
| >>> Wouldn't doing away with the macro-char t (also) greatly reduce the
| >>> ddos risk?
| >>> What is t needed for, anyway?
| >
| > It could be useful if you intentionally don't want lookups to be cached.
|
| The correct solution to the problem of not wanting stuff cached would
| be to set the TTL to 1. That way, people's DNS cache won't be flooded
| with bogus entries.
|
it's more for the exp url.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)½§Åv¼ð¦ç?2b¥yÈbox(_dot_)com