--spf(_at_)jdl(_dot_)com wrote:
What bothered me about the multiple TXT records approach was that
one can't really tell if a TXT record was intended to be for SPF's
use unless it had the "v=spf1" prefix or it "looked right" and did
not have syntax errors.
My understanding is that it MUST begin with v=spf1 and one should not
assume that any other TXT records contain spf info without the right
prefix. That makes it easier to know for sure what the publisher
intended...
gregc
--
Greg Connor <gconnor(_at_)nekodojo(_dot_)org>
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡