spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 'l'? and protocol-freeze

2004-01-15 06:55:24
In <400679A8(_dot_)8070801(_at_)phase(_dot_)org> Wechsler 
<wechsler(_at_)phase(_dot_)org> writes:

I've suddenly seen 1000 SPF records with the mechanism 'l' in
them... did I miss something here? It's rather upsetting the
"warnings" figures in the adoption roll.

My guess is this is someone with a large number of domains that made
an error while updating stuff.  I have not heard of any discussion of
such a mechanism.  


Secondly, can the SPF protocol now be considered frozen? If not, when
do we expect it to be?

Meng said the spec is frozen.  I don't think it is a good idea to make
any incompatible changes and there needs to be a good reason for any
change.


-wayne

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>