SPF Discuss (thread)
Announcement: Mailbox Reputation Scheme,
Dan Boresjo,
2004/01/30
- Re: Announcement: Mailbox Reputation Scheme, wayne, 2004/01/30
- RE: Announcement: Mailbox Reputation Scheme, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/30
- RE: Announcement: Mailbox Reputation Scheme, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/30
- RE: Announcement: Mailbox Reputation Scheme, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/30
Compliance,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip,
2004/01/29
- Re: Compliance, James Couzens, 2004/01/29
- RE: Compliance, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/30
- Re: Compliance, Computerized Horizons, 2004/01/30
- RE: Compliance, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/30
- RE: Compliance, Computerized Horizons, 2004/01/30
RE: Extensibility (was: [OT] Frozen or slushy?),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip,
2004/01/29
- Re: Extensibility, wayne, 2004/01/29
- Re: Extensibility, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/29
- RE: Extensibility, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/29
- RE: Extensibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/01/30
- Re: Extensibility, Wechsler, 2004/01/30
- RE: Extensibility, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/30
- Re: Extensibility, Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/30
- RE: Extensibility, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/29
patenting SPF,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/01/29
- Re: patenting SPF, Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/29
- Re: patenting SPF, Thomas H Jones II, 2004/01/30
- RE: patenting SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/29
- RE: patenting SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/31
- RE: patenting SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/31
Re: clamav plugin?,
Guillaume Filion,
2004/01/29
- Re: Re: clamav plugin?, Guillaume Filion, 2004/01/29
- Received-SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/29
- RE: Received-SPF, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/29
- Re: Received-SPF, Guillaume Filion, 2004/01/29
- RE: Received-SPF, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/29
- Re[2]: Received-SPF, Sanford Whiteman, 2004/01/29
- Re: Received-SPF, wayne, 2004/01/29
- Re: Received-SPF, Guillaume Filion, 2004/01/29
- RE: Received-SPF, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/30
- Re: Re: clamav plugin?, Wechsler, 2004/01/30
- Re: Re: clamav plugin?, Guillaume Filion, 2004/01/30
- RE: Re: clamav plugin?, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/30
- Re: Re: clamav plugin?, Mark, 2004/01/30
- Re: Re: clamav plugin?, Guillaume Filion, 2004/01/30
- Re: Re: clamav plugin?, wayne, 2004/01/30
- RE: Re: clamav plugin?, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/30
- Re: Re: clamav plugin?, Guillaume Filion, 2004/01/30
- RE: clamav plugin?, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/30
- Re: clamav plugin?, Guillaume Filion, 2004/01/30
- RE: clamav plugin?, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/30
- Re: clamav plugin?, Guillaume Filion, 2004/01/30
- RE: clamav plugin?, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/30
- Re: Re: clamav plugin?, Mark, 2004/01/30
- Re: clamav plugin?, Matt Perry, 2004/01/30
- RE: Re: clamav plugin?, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/01/30
Summary: Current state of SPF,
Wechsler,
2004/01/29
- Re: Summary: Current state of SPF, wayne, 2004/01/29
- Re: Summary: Current state of SPF, Wechsler, 2004/01/29
- Re: Summary: Current state of SPF, Wechsler, 2004/01/29
- Re: Summary: Current state of SPF, wayne, 2004/01/29
- Re: Summary: Current state of SPF, tv+spf, 2004/01/29
- Re: Summary: Current state of SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/29
- Re: Summary: Current state of SPF, wayne, 2004/01/29
- Re: Summary: Current state of SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/29
- Re: Summary: Current state of SPF, wayne, 2004/01/29
- Re: Summary: Current state of SPF, tv+spf, 2004/01/29
- Re: Summary: Current state of SPF, wayne, 2004/01/29
- Re: Summary: Current state of SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/29
- Re: Summary: Current state of SPF, wayne, 2004/01/29
- Re: Summary: Current state of SPF, Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/29
- Re: Summary: Current state of SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/29
- Re: Summary: Current state of SPF, wayne, 2004/01/29
- Re: Summary: Current state of SPF, Philip Gladstone, 2004/01/29
- Re: Summary: Current state of SPF, wayne, 2004/01/29
- Re: Summary: Current state of SPF, Philip Gladstone, 2004/01/29
- Re: Summary: Current state of SPF, Wechsler, 2004/01/30
- Re: Summary: Current state of SPF, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/01/29
- Re: Summary: Current state of SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/29
- RE: Summary: Current state of SPF, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/29
- Re: Summary: Current state of SPF, Wechsler, 2004/01/30
- Draft finalization issues, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/29
- Re: Summary: Current state of SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/01/29
- Re: Summary: Current state of SPF, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/01/29
- RE: Summary: Current state of SPF, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/01/30
- RE: Summary: Current state of SPF, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/01/30
SPF and mydoom,
Wechsler,
2004/01/29
- Re: SPF and mydoom, Alain Knaff, 2004/01/29
- Re: SPF and mydoom, Wechsler, 2004/01/29
- Re: SPF and mydoom, tv+spf, 2004/01/29
- Re: SPF and mydoom, Alain Knaff, 2004/01/29
- Re: SPF and mydoom, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/29
- OT: Re: SPF and mydoom, Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/29
- SPF and viruses, Fridrik Skulason, 2004/01/30
- Re: SPF and viruses, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/01/30
- Re: SPF and viruses, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/01/30
- Re: SPF and viruses, Fridrik Skulason, 2004/01/30
- Re: SPF and viruses, Guillaume Filion, 2004/01/30
[OT]Frozen or slushy?,
Wechsler,
2004/01/28
- Re: [OT]Frozen or slushy?, wayne, 2004/01/28
- RE: [OT]Frozen or slushy?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/28
- RE: [OT]Frozen or slushy?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/29
- RE: [OT]Frozen or slushy?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/29
Handling forward?,
Dennis Carr,
2004/01/26
- Re: Handling forward?, Christopher Chan, 2004/01/27
- Re: Handling forward?, James Couzens, 2004/01/27
- Re: Handling forward?, Wechsler, 2004/01/27
- Re: Handling forward?, Phil Howard, 2004/01/27
- Re: Handling forward?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/27
- Re: Handling forward?, Christopher Chan, 2004/01/27
- Re: Handling forward?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/27
- Re: Handling forward?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/01/27
- Re: Handling forward?, Alain Knaff, 2004/01/27
- Re: Handling forward?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/01/27
- Re: Handling forward?, Christopher Chan, 2004/01/27
- Re: Handling forward?, Alain Knaff, 2004/01/27
Mechanism usage in live SPF records,
Wechsler,
2004/01/26
- Re: Mechanism usage in live SPF records, Wechsler, 2004/01/26
- Re: Mechanism usage in live SPF records, wayne, 2004/01/26
- Re: Mechanism usage in live SPF records, Thomas Harold, 2004/01/27
- Re: Mechanism usage in live SPF records, Wechsler, 2004/01/27
- Re: Mechanism usage in live SPF records, Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/27
- RE: Mechanism usage in live SPF records, Will Senn, 2004/01/27
- Re: Mechanism usage in live SPF records, Wechsler, 2004/01/27
- RE: Mechanism usage in live SPF records, Will Senn, 2004/01/27
- RE: Mechanism usage in live SPF records, Will Senn, 2004/01/27
- Re: Mechanism usage in live SPF records, Wechsler, 2004/01/27
- Re: Mechanism usage in live SPF records, Wechsler, 2004/01/27
- Re: Mechanism usage in live SPF records, Thomas Harold, 2004/01/27
- Re: Mechanism usage in live SPF records, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/27
- Re: Mechanism usage in live SPF records, Guillaume Filion, 2004/01/27
- Re: Mechanism usage in live SPF records, Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/27
- return of SOFTFAIL, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/27
- Re: return of SOFTFAIL, Matthew Barr, 2004/01/27
- Re: return of SOFTFAIL, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/27
- Re: return of SOFTFAIL, wayne, 2004/01/27
- SPF spec is frozen, but I don't think it has been finalized, wayne, 2004/01/27
- Re: SPF spec is frozen, but I don't think it has been finalized, Phil Howard, 2004/01/27
- Re: SPF spec is frozen, but I don't think it has been finalized, Mark, 2004/01/28
- Re: Mechanism usage in live SPF records, Wechsler, 2004/01/28
- Re: Mechanism usage in live SPF records, Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/27
- RE: Mechanism usage in live SPF records, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/27
- RE: Mechanism usage in live SPF records, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/27
- RE: Mechanism usage in live SPF records, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/27
EhWHAT?,
Wechsler,
2004/01/25
- Oh That, Wechsler, 2004/01/25
- Re: Oh That, David Saez, 2004/01/25
- RE: Oh That, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/25
- Re: Oh That, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/25
- RE: Oh That, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/25
- Re: Oh That, David Saez, 2004/01/25
- Re: Oh That, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/01/25
- Re: Oh That, Wechsler, 2004/01/25
- Re: Oh That, David Saez, 2004/01/26
- Re: Oh That, B. Johannessen, 2004/01/26
- SPF advocacy, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/25
- Re: SPF advocacy, Greg Wooledge, 2004/01/25
- Re: SPF in MTAs, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/25
- Re: SPF in MTAs, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/25
- Re: SPF in MTAs, Tim Wilde, 2004/01/25
- Re: SPF in MTAs, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/25
- Re: SPF in MTAs, wayne, 2004/01/25
- Re: SPF in MTAs, Matt Perry, 2004/01/25
- Re: Re: SPF in MTAs, Sanford Whiteman, 2004/01/25
- Re: Re: SPF in MTAs, wayne, 2004/01/25
- Re: Re: SPF in MTAs, James Couzens, 2004/01/25
- Re: Re: SPF in MTAs, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/01/25
- Re: Re: SPF in MTAs, James Couzens, 2004/01/25
- Re: Re: SPF in MTAs, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/01/25
- Re: Re: SPF in MTAs, Steven G. Willis, 2004/01/25
- Re: SPF in MTAs, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/01/25
- Re: SPF in MTAs, Greg Wooledge, 2004/01/25
- Re: SPF in MTAs, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/01/25
- Re: SPF advocacy, Matt Perry, 2004/01/25
- Re: SPF advocacy, Wechsler, 2004/01/25
- Re: SPF advocacy, Mark, 2004/01/25
- Re: SPF advocacy, wayne, 2004/01/25
- Re: SPF advocacy, Greg Wooledge, 2004/01/25
- Re: SPF advocacy, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/25
- Re: SPF advocacy, Greg Connor, 2004/01/25
- Re: SPF advocacy, wayne, 2004/01/25
- Re: SPF advocacy, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/01/25
Response to the Bellovin Critique of SPF,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/01/23
- Re: Response to the Bellovin Critique of SPF, Steven G. Willis, 2004/01/24
- return of softfail, and its sidekick 'none', Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/24
- Re: Response to the Bellovin Critique of SPF, wayne, 2004/01/24
- RE: Response to the Bellovin Critique of SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/25
- RE: Response to the Bellovin Critique of SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/25
SPF design refrozen,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/01/23
- Re: SPF design refrozen, Justin Mason, 2004/01/23
- Re: SPF design refrozen, Matt Perry, 2004/01/23
- Re: SPF design refrozen, Phil Howard, 2004/01/23
- Re: SPF design refrozen, wayne, 2004/01/23
- Re: SPF design refrozen, Wechsler, 2004/01/24
- Re: SPF design refrozen, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/01/24
- RE: SPF design refrozen, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/23
The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email",
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/01/22
- Re: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email", Phil Howard, 2004/01/22
- Re: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email", wayne, 2004/01/22
- Re: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email", Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/22
- Re: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email", Phil Howard, 2004/01/23
- Re: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email", Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/23
- Re: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email", Phil Howard, 2004/01/24
- RE: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email", Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/23
- Re: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email", Phil Howard, 2004/01/24
- RE: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email", Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/24
- Re: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email", Phil Howard, 2004/01/24
- Re: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email", Philip Gladstone, 2004/01/23
- Re: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email", Tim Wilde, 2004/01/23
- Re: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email", Phil Howard, 2004/01/24
- Re: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email", Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/24
- Re: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email", Phil Howard, 2004/01/24
- Re: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email", wayne, 2004/01/24
- Re: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email", Phil Howard, 2004/01/24
- Re: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email", Philip Gladstone, 2004/01/24
- Re: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email", Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/24
- Re: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email", wayne, 2004/01/24
- RE: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email", Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/23
- RE: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email", Marc Alaia, 2004/01/23
- RE: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email", Marc Alaia, 2004/01/23
- RE: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email", Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/24
- Re: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email", Phil Howard, 2004/01/24
- Re: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email", Terence Way, 2004/01/24
- Microsoft Patent on XML format, Richard Pitt, 2004/01/24
- Re: Microsoft Patent on XML format, Richard Pitt, 2004/01/24
- Re: Microsoft Patent on XML format, Phil Howard, 2004/01/24
- Re: Microsoft Patent on XML format, wayne, 2004/01/24
- Re: Microsoft Patent on XML format, Matt Perry, 2004/01/25
On XML,
Matt Sergeant,
2004/01/22
SPF story on news.com,
Tim Gladding,
2004/01/22
- Re: SPF story on news.com, wayne, 2004/01/22
- RE: SPF story on news.com, Marc Alaia, 2004/01/22
- RE: SPF story on news.com, Jameel Akari, 2004/01/22
- Re: SPF story on news.com, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/22
- Translating how-to and advocacy documents (was: SPF story on news.com), Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/22
- Re: Translating how-to and advocacy documents (was: SPF story on news.com), rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/01/22
- Re: Translating how-to and advocacy documents (was: SPF story on news.com), Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/22
- RE: Translating how-to and advocacy documents, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/23
- Re: Translating how-to and advocacy documents, Wechsler, 2004/01/23
CNAMEs,
Henrik Edlund,
2004/01/22
Extensibility and Accreditation,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/01/22
- Re: Extensibility and Accreditation, wayne, 2004/01/22
- Re: Extensibility and Accreditation, Phil Howard, 2004/01/22
- RE: Extensibility and Accreditation, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/22
- Re: Extensibility and Accreditation, wayne, 2004/01/22
- Re: Extensibility and Accreditation, Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/22
- Re: Extensibility and Accreditation, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/22
- Re: Extensibility and Accreditation, wayne, 2004/01/22
- Re: Extensibility and Accreditation, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/22
- Re: Extensibility and Accreditation, Phil Howard, 2004/01/22
- RE: Extensibility and Accreditation, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/22
- RE: Extensibility and Accreditation, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/22
- Re: Extensibility and Accreditation, wayne, 2004/01/22
- Re: Extensibility and Accreditation, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/22
- Re: Extensibility and Accreditation, wayne, 2004/01/22
- Re: Extensibility and Accreditation, Justin Mason, 2004/01/22
- Re: Extensibility and Accreditation, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/22
- Re: Extensibility and Accreditation, Justin Mason, 2004/01/22
SPF - ISP's vs Corporate,
Marc Alaia,
2004/01/22
- Re: SPF - ISP's vs Corporate, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/01/22
- Re: SPF - ISP's vs Corporate, johnc-lists, 2004/01/22
- RE: SPF - ISP's vs Corporate, Brian Coloney, 2004/01/22
- RE: SPF - ISP's vs Corporate, Marc Alaia, 2004/01/22
- RE: SPF - ISP's vs Corporate, William Astle, 2004/01/22
- RE: SPF - ISP's vs Corporate, johnc-lists, 2004/01/22
- Re: SPF - ISP's vs Corporate, Alain Knaff, 2004/01/22
- Re: SPF - ISP's vs Corporate, Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/22
- Re: SPF - ISP's vs Corporate, Phil Howard, 2004/01/22
- RE: SPF - ISP's vs Corporate, Marc Alaia, 2004/01/22
- RE: SPF - ISP's vs Corporate, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/01/22
- RE: SPF - ISP's vs Corporate, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/01/22
- RE: SPF - ISP's vs Corporate, Marc Alaia, 2004/01/22
step by step deploment,
Za'mbori, Zolta'n,
2004/01/21
- Re: step by step deploment, wayne, 2004/01/21
- Re: step by step deploment, Za'mbori, Zolta'n, 2004/01/21
- Re: Re: step by step deploment, wayne, 2004/01/21
- Re: Re: step by step deploment, Alain Knaff, 2004/01/21
- Re: step by step deploment, Za'mbori, Zolta'n, 2004/01/21
- Re: Re: step by step deploment, wayne, 2004/01/21
- Re: step by step deploment, Za'mbori, Zolta'n, 2004/01/21
- Re: Re: step by step deploment, Kelson Vibber, 2004/01/21
- Re: Re: step by step deploment, wayne, 2004/01/21
- Re: Re: step by step deploment, James Couzens, 2004/01/21
- Re: Re: step by step deploment, wayne, 2004/01/21
- Re: Re: step by step deploment, ty lammy, 2004/01/21
- Re: Re: step by step deploment, wayne, 2004/01/21
- Re: Re: step by step deploment, John A. Martin, 2004/01/22
- bugs in rfc2821, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/22
- Re: bugs in rfc2821, Za'mbori, Zolta'n, 2004/01/22
- Re: bugs in rfc2821, Za'mbori, Zolta'n, 2004/01/22
- Re: Re: bugs in rfc2821, John A. Martin, 2004/01/22
- Re: bugs in rfc2821, John A. Martin, 2004/01/22
- Re: bugs in rfc2821, John Warren, 2004/01/23
- Re: Re: step by step deploment, wayne, 2004/01/22
- Re: Re: step by step deploment, John Warren, 2004/01/25
- Re: Re: step by step deploment, Thomas R. Stephenson, 2004/01/22
- Re: Re: step by step deploment, Henrik Edlund, 2004/01/22
- Re: Re: step by step deploment, Thomas R. Stephenson, 2004/01/22
- Re: Re: step by step deploment, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/22
- Re: Re: step by step deploment, Aredridel, 2004/01/22
- Re: Re: step by step deploment, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/22
- Re: Re: step by step deploment, wayne, 2004/01/22
- Re: Re: step by step deploment, Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/22
- Re: step by step deploment, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/21
- Re: step by step deploment, Wechsler, 2004/01/21
The case for XML,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip,
2004/01/21
- Re: The case for XML, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/21
- Re: The case for XML, wayne, 2004/01/21
- Re: The case for XML, Phil Howard, 2004/01/22
- Re: The case for XML, R. Scott Perry, 2004/01/21
- RE: The case for XML, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/21
- RE: The case for XML, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/21
considering XML,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, George Schlossnagle, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Alan Hodgson, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Justin Mason, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, wayne, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, wayne, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, wayne, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, James Couzens, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Kelson Vibber, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Justin Mason, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Tim Wilde, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Mark Lentczner, 2004/01/21
- RE: considering XML, lcarver, 2004/01/22
- RE: considering XML, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/22
- Re: considering XML, Mark Lentczner, 2004/01/22
- Re: considering XML, Phil Howard, 2004/01/22
- Re: considering XML, Phil Howard, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Phil Howard, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Phil Howard, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Henrik Edlund, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, R. Scott Perry, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Wechsler, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Phil Howard, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Phil Howard, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Wechsler, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Mark, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Andy, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Mark, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, guillaume, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Wechsler, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Phil Howard, 2004/01/22
- Re: considering XML, Phil Howard, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Kelson Vibber, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, wayne, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Tim Gladding, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, wayne, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, wayne, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Phil Howard, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Wechsler, 2004/01/22
- Re: considering XML, Phil Howard, 2004/01/22
- Re: considering XML, Wechsler, 2004/01/22
- Re: considering XML, wayne, 2004/01/22
- Re: considering XML, James Couzens, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Phil Howard, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Matt Perry, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Aredridel, 2004/01/21
- RE: considering XML, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Carsten Kuckuk, 2004/01/21
- RE: considering XML, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/21
- RE: considering XML, R. Scott Perry, 2004/01/21
- Re: considering XML, Carsten Kuckuk, 2004/01/22
- Re: considering XML, Carsten Kuckuk, 2004/01/22
- Re: considering XML, Thomas R. Stephenson, 2004/01/22
- OT: popfile, James Couzens, 2004/01/22
- Re: OT: popfile, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/22
- Re: OT: popfile, Thomas R. Stephenson, 2004/01/22
- Re: OT: popfile, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/22
- Re: OT: popfile, Thomas R. Stephenson, 2004/01/22
- Re: OT: popfile, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/01/22
- Re: OT: popfile, Thomas R. Stephenson, 2004/01/22
- Re: considering XML, Carsten Kuckuk, 2004/01/22
Using headers instead of SRS,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/01/20
- Re: Using headers instead of SRS, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/20
- Re: Using headers instead of SRS, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/20
- Re: Using headers instead of SRS, Greg Connor, 2004/01/24
- Re: Using headers instead of SRS, Wechsler, 2004/01/25
- Re: Using headers instead of SRS, Greg Connor, 2004/01/25
- RE: Using headers instead of SRS, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/25
- RE: Using headers instead of SRS, Greg Connor, 2004/01/25
- Re: Using headers instead of SRS, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/01/25
- RE: Using headers instead of SRS, Steven G. Willis, 2004/01/25
- RE: Using headers instead of SRS, list+spf-discuss, 2004/01/25
- RE: Using headers instead of SRS, Steven G. Willis, 2004/01/25
- RE: Using headers instead of SRS, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/25
- RE: Using headers instead of SRS, Greg Connor, 2004/01/25
- RE: Using headers instead of SRS, tv+spf, 2004/01/25
- RE: Using headers instead of SRS, Greg Connor, 2004/01/25
- RE: Using headers instead of SRS, tv+spf, 2004/01/26
- RE: Using headers instead of SRS, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/26
- RE: Using headers instead of SRS, tv+spf, 2004/01/26
- RE: Using headers instead of SRS, Greg Connor, 2004/01/26
- RE: Using headers instead of SRS, Steven G. Willis, 2004/01/26
- RE: Using headers instead of SRS, Greg Connor, 2004/01/26
- Re: Using headers instead of SRS, wayne, 2004/01/26
- Re: Using headers instead of SRS, Steven G. Willis, 2004/01/26
- Message not available
- Re: Using headers instead of SRS, Mark, 2004/01/27
- RE: Using headers instead of SRS, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/26
- RE: Using headers instead of SRS, tv+spf, 2004/01/26
- RE: Using headers instead of SRS, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/26
- RE: Using headers instead of SRS, tv+spf, 2004/01/26
- Re: Using headers instead of SRS, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/26
- RE: Using headers instead of SRS, John Warren, 2004/01/25
- Re: Using headers instead of SRS, John A. Martin, 2004/01/21
- Re: Using headers instead of SRS, Ask Bjørn Hansen, 2004/01/20
- Re: Using headers instead of SRS, Steve +1 608 278 7700, 2004/01/20
- RE: Using headers instead of SRS, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/21
- Re: Using headers instead of SRS, Za'mbori, Zolta'n, 2004/01/21
- Re: Re: Using headers instead of SRS, Alain Knaff, 2004/01/21
- Re: Using headers instead of SRS, Za'mbori, Zolta'n, 2004/01/21
- Re: Re: Using headers instead of SRS, Alain Knaff, 2004/01/21
- Re: Using headers instead of SRS, Za'mbori, Zolta'n, 2004/01/21
Changing the meaning of "mail from" is stillborn,
arnold+spf,
2004/01/20
- Re: Changing the meaning of "mail from" is stillborn, Ernesto Baschny, 2004/01/20
- Re: Changing the meaning of "mail from" is stillborn, Steve +1 608 278 7700, 2004/01/20
- Re: Changing the meaning of "mail from" is stillborn, Za'mbori, Zolta'n, 2004/01/20
- Re: Re: Changing the meaning of "mail from" is stillborn, wayne, 2004/01/20
- Re: Re: Changing the meaning of "mail from" is stillborn, Za'mbori, Zolta'n, 2004/01/20
- Re: Re: Changing the meaning of "mail from" is stillborn, wayne, 2004/01/20
- Re[2]: Re: Changing the meaning of "mail from" is stillborn, Sanford Whiteman, 2004/01/20
- Re: Re: Changing the meaning of "mail from" is stillborn, wayne, 2004/01/20
- Re: Re: Changing the meaning of "mail from" is stillborn, Za'mbori, Zolta'n, 2004/01/20
- the forwarding problem, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/20
- RE: Changing the meaning of "mail from" is stillborn, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/20
- Re: RE: Changing the meaning of "mail from" is stillborn, Za'mbori, Zolta'n, 2004/01/20
- Re: Changing the meaning of "mail from" is stillborn, Jim Ramsay, 2004/01/20
- Re: Re: Changing the meaning of "mail from" is stillborn, Za'mbori, Zolta'n, 2004/01/20
- Re: Re: Changing the meaning of "mail from" is stillborn, wayne, 2004/01/20
- Re: Changing the meaning of "mail from" is stillborn, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/01/20
Re: Solving the Forwarding Problem for good!!!,
John Warren,
2004/01/18
- Re: Solving the Forwarding Problem for good!!!, wayne, 2004/01/18
- Re: Solving the Forwarding Problem for good!!!, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/01/18
- RE: Solving the Forwarding Problem for good!!!, Marc Alaia, 2004/01/19
- rejection at SMTP time?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/19
- RE: rejection at SMTP time?, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/20
- RE: rejection at SMTP time?, John Warren, 2004/01/20
- Re: rejection at SMTP time?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/01/20
- Re: rejection at SMTP time?, arnold+spf, 2004/01/20
- Re: rejection at SMTP time?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/01/20
- RE: rejection at SMTP time?, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/20
- Re: RE: rejection at SMTP time?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/01/21
- Re: RE: rejection at SMTP time?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/21
- Re: RE: rejection at SMTP time?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/01/21
- Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/21
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/01/21
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, Andy Lester, 2004/01/21
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, Sam Norris, 2004/01/21
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, Hans Dieter Pearcey, 2004/01/21
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/01/21
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/21
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, William Astle, 2004/01/21
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/01/21
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, John Capo, 2004/01/21
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, Larry Smith, 2004/01/21
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, Rob Kaper, 2004/01/21
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/01/23
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, tv+spf, 2004/01/23
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, johnc-lists, 2004/01/23
- RE: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, Jeremy Doupe, 2004/01/23
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/01/23
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, tv+spf, 2004/01/23
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/01/23
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, tv+spf, 2004/01/23
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/01/26
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, tv+spf, 2004/01/26
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/01/26
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, tv+spf, 2004/01/26
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/01/29
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/29
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, tv+spf, 2004/01/29
- Implimenting SPF in Sendmail, Dan Willett Sr., 2004/01/26
- Re: Implimenting SPF in Sendmail, Mark, 2004/01/26
- Re: Implimenting SPF in Sendmail, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/26
- Re: Implimenting SPF in Sendmail, wayne, 2004/01/26
- Is Return-Path as available as we think?, Greg Connor, 2004/01/26
- Re: Is Return-Path as available as we think?, wayne, 2004/01/26
- Re: Is Return-Path as available as we think?, Mark, 2004/01/26
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, Aredridel, 2004/01/21
- Re: Calling ISPs: does bandwidth matter to your bottom line?, RK Mail LIst, 2004/01/21
- which DNS does SPF record belong in + macro question, Seth Goodman, 2004/01/21
- Re: which DNS does SPF record belong in + macro question, Kelson Vibber, 2004/01/21
- RE: which DNS does SPF record belong in + macro question, Seth Goodman, 2004/01/21
- Re: which DNS does SPF record belong in + macro question, wayne, 2004/01/21
- RE: which DNS does SPF record belong in + macro question, Seth Goodman, 2004/01/22
- RE: which DNS does SPF record belong in + macro question, John Warren, 2004/01/22
- RE: which DNS does SPF record belong in + macro question, Seth Goodman, 2004/01/21
My first SPF rejection,
Mark Tranchant,
2004/01/17
- Re: My first SPF rejection, Phil Howard, 2004/01/17
- Re: My first SPF rejection, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/01/17
- Re: My first SPF rejection, Za'mbori, Zolta'n, 2004/01/19
- Re: Re: My first SPF rejection, wayne, 2004/01/19
- Re: My first SPF rejection, Za'mbori, Zolta'n, 2004/01/19
- Re: Re: My first SPF rejection, wayne, 2004/01/19
- Re: My first SPF rejection, Za'mbori, Zolta'n, 2004/01/19
- Re: Re: My first SPF rejection, wayne, 2004/01/19
- Re: Re: My first SPF rejection, Sanford Whiteman, 2004/01/19
provocative article at BusinessWeek about Yahoo DomainKeys, etc,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/01/14
- Re: provocative article at BusinessWeek about Yahoo DomainKeys, etc, Rik van Riel, 2004/01/14
- proposed PGP mechanism for SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/14
- Re: proposed PGP mechanism for SPF, Rob Kaper, 2004/01/14
- Re: proposed PGP mechanism for SPF, Brian Hatch, 2004/01/14
- Re: proposed PGP mechanism for SPF, Ask Bjørn Hansen, 2004/01/15
- Re: proposed PGP mechanism for SPF, Nick Phillips, 2004/01/15
- Re: proposed PGP mechanism for SPF, Mark, 2004/01/15
- Re: proposed PGP mechanism for SPF, wayne, 2004/01/15
- Re: proposed PGP mechanism for SPF, George Schlossnagle, 2004/01/15
- Re: proposed PGP mechanism for SPF, guillaume, 2004/01/15
- Re: proposed PGP mechanism for SPF, wayne, 2004/01/15
- Re: proposed PGP mechanism for SPF, Greg Wooledge, 2004/01/15
- Re: proposed PGP mechanism for SPF, Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/15
- Re: proposed PGP mechanism for SPF, Rik van Riel, 2004/01/15
- Re: proposed PGP mechanism for SPF, Mark, 2004/01/15
- Re: proposed PGP mechanism for SPF, guillaume, 2004/01/15
- Re: proposed PGP mechanism for SPF, Matt Perry, 2004/01/15
- Re: proposed PGP mechanism for SPF, Brian Hatch, 2004/01/15
- Qmail integer overflow in 1.03/1.04 - PATCH RELEASED, James Couzens, 2004/01/15
- Re: Qmail integer overflow in 1.03/1.04 - PATCH RELEASED, guillaume, 2004/01/15
- Re: Qmail integer overflow in 1.03/1.04 - PATCH RELEASED, guillaume, 2004/01/15
- Re: proposed PGP mechanism for SPF, Philip Gladstone, 2004/01/15
- Re: provocative article at BusinessWeek about Yahoo DomainKeys, etc, wayne, 2004/01/14
- Re: provocative article at BusinessWeek about Yahoo DomainKeys, etc, Sean Comeau, 2004/01/15
Re: SRS requirements,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/01/14
- Re: SRS requirements, wayne, 2004/01/14
- Re: SRS requirements, wayne, 2004/01/14
- Re: SRS requirements, wayne, 2004/01/14
- Re: SRS requirements, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/14
- Re: SRS requirements, Gerald, 2004/01/14
- Re: SRS requirements, Ask Bjørn Hansen, 2004/01/14
- Re: SRS requirements, Greg Connor, 2004/01/14
implementation question,
Roger,
2004/01/13
- Re: implementation question, Kelson Vibber, 2004/01/13
- Re: implementation question, Roger, 2004/01/13
- Re: implementation question, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/13
- Re: implementation question, Justin Mason, 2004/01/13
- Re: implementation question, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/13
- Re: implementation question, Jim Ramsay, 2004/01/14
- Re: Re: implementation question, wayne, 2004/01/14
- Re: implementation question, Jim Ramsay, 2004/01/14
- Re: implementation question, Wechsler, 2004/01/14
- Re: implementation question, Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/14
- Re: implementation question, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/01/14
- Mail with suspicious HTML tag discarded., Root, 2004/01/14
- Re: Mail with suspicious HTML tag discarded., wayne, 2004/01/14
- Mail with suspicious HTML tag discarded., Root, 2004/01/14
- Re: Mail with suspicious HTML tag discarded., Alain Knaff, 2004/01/14
- Mail with suspicious HTML tag discarded., Root, 2004/01/14
- Re: Mail with suspicious HTML tag discarded., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/01/14
- Mail with suspicious HTML tag discarded., Root, 2004/01/14
- Re: Mail with suspicious HTML tag discarded., Thomas R. Stephenson, 2004/01/14
- Re: Mail with suspicious HTML tag discarded., Greg Connor, 2004/01/14
- Re: implementation question, Thomas R. Stephenson, 2004/01/15
- Re: implementation question, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/01/15
- Re: implementation question, Greg Connor, 2004/01/15
- Re: implementation question, George Schlossnagle, 2004/01/15
- Re: implementation question, Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/15
- Re: implementation question, wayne, 2004/01/14
- Re: implementation question, Wechsler, 2004/01/14
- Re: implementation question, Thomas R. Stephenson, 2004/01/14
- RE: implementation question, Dirk Van Mieghem, 2004/01/14
New DNS record issue.,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip,
2004/01/13
- Re: New DNS record issue., wayne, 2004/01/13
- Re: New DNS record issue., John Capo, 2004/01/13
- RE: New DNS record issue., Richard Hansen, 2004/01/13
- RE: New DNS record issue., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/13
- RE: New DNS record issue., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/13
- RE: New DNS record issue., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/13
- Re: New DNS record issue., Wechsler, 2004/01/13
- Re: New DNS record issue., John Capo, 2004/01/13
- Re: New DNS record issue., Wechsler, 2004/01/14
- Re: New DNS record issue., guillaume, 2004/01/14
- Re: New DNS record issue., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/01/14
- Mail with suspicious HTML tag discarded., Root, 2004/01/14
- Re: New DNS record issue., John Capo, 2004/01/14
- RE: New DNS record issue., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/13
- RE: New DNS record issue., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/13
- RE: New DNS record issue., Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/01/13
- RE: New DNS record issue., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/16
SPF + Challenge/Response,
Marc Alaia,
2004/01/13
- Re: SPF + Challenge/Response, wayne, 2004/01/13
- Re[2]: SPF + Challenge/Response, Chris Drake, 2004/01/13
- What is the QUERY_TYPE code for an SPF DNS lookup?, Chris Drake, 2004/01/13
- Re: What is the QUERY_TYPE code for an SPF DNS lookup?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/13
- Re[2]: What is the QUERY_TYPE code for an SPF DNS lookup?, Chris Drake, 2004/01/13
- Re: What is the QUERY_TYPE code for an SPF DNS lookup?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/13
- Re: What is the QUERY_TYPE code for an SPF DNS lookup?, Weldon Whipple, 2004/01/13
- Re: What is the QUERY_TYPE code for an SPF DNS lookup?, Phil Howard, 2004/01/13
- Re: SPF + Challenge/Response, tv+spf, 2004/01/13
- RE: SPF + Challenge/Response, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/13
- RE: SPF + Challenge/Response, Marc Alaia, 2004/01/13
- Re: SPF + Challenge/Response, Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/13
- Re: SPF + Challenge/Response, tv+spf, 2004/01/13
- Re: SPF + Challenge/Response, Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/13
- Re: SPF + Challenge/Response, wayne, 2004/01/13
- Re: SPF + Challenge/Response, Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/13
- Re: SPF + Challenge/Response, Phil Howard, 2004/01/13
- RE: SPF + Challenge/Response, Marc Alaia, 2004/01/13
- RE: SPF + Challenge/Response, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/13
RE: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidi ty.,
Marc Alaia,
2004/01/13
- the inevitability of SRS, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/13
- Re: the inevitability of SRS, Anthony Howe, 2004/01/13
- Re: the inevitability of SRS, wayne, 2004/01/13
- Re: the inevitability of SRS, Roy Badami, 2004/01/13
- Re: the inevitability of SRS, Anthony Howe, 2004/01/13
- Re: the inevitability of SRS, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/13
- Re: the inevitability of SRS, Roy Badami, 2004/01/13
- Re: the inevitability of SRS, Philip Gladstone, 2004/01/13
- Re: the inevitability of SRS, Ask Bjørn Hansen, 2004/01/13
- Re: (foreign language encoded in ) Re: the inevitability of SRS, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/13
- Re: (foreign language encoded in ) Re: the inevitability of SRS, wayne, 2004/01/13
- Re: (foreign language encoded in ) Re: the inevitability of SRS, wayne, 2004/01/13
- Re: (foreign language encoded in ) Re: the inevitability of SRS, Anthony Howe, 2004/01/14
- Re: (foreign language encoded in ) Re: the inevitability of SRS, Roy Badami, 2004/01/14
- RE: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidi ty., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/13
- Re[2]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidi ty., Chris Drake, 2004/01/13
- Re: Re[2]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidi ty., Alain Knaff, 2004/01/13
- Re[4]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidi ty., Chris Drake, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidi ty., Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/13
- The path to a PKI architecture, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidi ty., Phil Howard, 2004/01/13
RE: Re[3]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity.,
Marc Alaia,
2004/01/13
- Re[5]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Chris Drake, 2004/01/13
- RE: Re[5]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Vivien M., 2004/01/13
- RE: Re[5]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Thomas R. Stephenson, 2004/01/13
- RE: Re[5]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Vivien M., 2004/01/13
- Re: Re[5]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Alain Knaff, 2004/01/13
- RE: Re[5]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Thomas R. Stephenson, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Phil Howard, 2004/01/13
- RE: Re[3]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Thomas R. Stephenson, 2004/01/13
- RE: Re[3]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Marc Alaia, 2004/01/13
Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity.,
Chris Drake,
2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Rik van Riel, 2004/01/13
- Re[2]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Chris Drake, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Mark Tranchant, 2004/01/13
- Re[2]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Chris Drake, 2004/01/13
- Re: Re[2]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Greg Connor, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Andy Lester, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Phil Howard, 2004/01/13
- Re[2]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Tim Gladding, 2004/01/13
- Re[3]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Chris Drake, 2004/01/13
- Re[3]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Tim Gladding, 2004/01/13
- Re[4]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Chris Drake, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Don Andrews, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Rob Kaper, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Phil Howard, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Wechsler, 2004/01/13
- Re[2]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Chris Drake, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/01/13
- Re[2]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Chris Drake, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Phil Howard, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Graham Murray, 2004/01/13
- Re[2]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Rik van Riel, 2004/01/13
- Re[3]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Chris Drake, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Jim Ramsay, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Wechsler, 2004/01/13
- Re[2]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Chris Drake, 2004/01/13
- Re: Re[2]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Ask Bjørn Hansen, 2004/01/13
- Re: Re[2]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Mark, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., wayne, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Matt Perry, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Phil Howard, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/01/13
- Re[2]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Chris Drake, 2004/01/13
- Re[2]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Rik van Riel, 2004/01/13
- Re[3]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Chris Drake, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Mark Tranchant, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Anthony Howe, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Phil Howard, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/13
- Re[2]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Chris Drake, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Matt Perry, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Phil Howard, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Anthony Howe, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., wayne, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Sean Comeau, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Phil Howard, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., jsb, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Bob Tanner, 2004/01/13
- Re: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity., Carsten Kuckuk, 2004/01/13
RE: how blacklisting will work in the future,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip,
2004/01/12
- Re: how blacklisting will work in the future: pki accreditation, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/12
- Re: how blacklisting will work in the future, wayne, 2004/01/12
- RE: how blacklisting will work in the future, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/12
- RE: how blacklisting will work in the future, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/12
- RE: how blacklisting will work in the future, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/12
- RE: how blacklisting will work in the future, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/12
Is anyone going to the MIT spam conference?,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/01/11
- Re: Is anyone going to the MIT spam conference?, Gerald Oskoboiny, 2004/01/12
- Re: Is anyone going to the MIT spam conference?, Philip Gladstone, 2004/01/13
- RE: Is anyone going to the MIT spam conference?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/12
- RE: Is anyone going to the MIT spam conference?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/13
- RE: Is anyone going to the MIT spam conference?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/13
MX and TXT,
geoffj,
2004/01/11
- Re: MX and TXT, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/11
- Re: MX and TXT, wayne, 2004/01/11
- Re: MX and TXT, geoffj, 2004/01/11
- Re: MX and TXT, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/11
- Re: MX and TXT, Greg Connor, 2004/01/12
- Re: MX and TXT, geoffj, 2004/01/12
- Re: MX and TXT, Alan Hodgson, 2004/01/12
- Re: MX and TXT, geoffj, 2004/01/12
- Re: MX and TXT, Brian Hatch, 2004/01/12
- Re: MX and TXT, geoffj, 2004/01/12
- Re: MX and TXT, Don Andrews, 2004/01/13
- Re: MX and TXT, Greg Connor, 2004/01/12
- Re: MX and TXT, Greg Connor, 2004/01/15
- MX and TXT, Marc Alaia, 2004/01/13
Solving the Forwarding Problem by Implementing SRS in Postfix,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/01/11
- Re: Solving the Forwarding Problem by Implementing SRS in Postfix, Greg Connor, 2004/01/12
- Solving the Forwarding Problem for good!!!, John Warren, 2004/01/17
- Re: Solving the Forwarding Problem for good!!!, Alain Knaff, 2004/01/17
- Re: Solving the Forwarding Problem for good!!!, Mark, 2004/01/17
- Re: Solving the Forwarding Problem for good!!!, John Warren, 2004/01/17
- Re: Solving the Forwarding Problem for good!!!, wayne, 2004/01/17
- Re: Solving the Forwarding Problem for good!!!, Mark, 2004/01/17
- Re: Solving the Forwarding Problem for good!!!, Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/17
- Re: Solving the Forwarding Problem for good!!!, Mark, 2004/01/17
- Re: Solving the Forwarding Problem for good!!!, Phil Howard, 2004/01/17
- Re: Solving the Forwarding Problem for good!!!, John Warren, 2004/01/17
- Re: Solving the Forwarding Problem for good!!!, Brian Hatch, 2004/01/17
- Re: Solving the Forwarding Problem for good!!!, Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/18
wiki,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/01/10
Good day for SPF,
Wechsler,
2004/01/09
- Re: Good day for SPF, Rob Kaper, 2004/01/09
- Re: Good day for SPF, wayne, 2004/01/09
- Re: Good day for SPF, ty lammy, 2004/01/09
- Re: Good day for SPF, wayne, 2004/01/09
- SPF mention in Wired News, ty lammy, 2004/01/20
SPF @ AOL --- record may flicker,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/01/08
- Re: SPF @ AOL --- record may flicker, wayne, 2004/01/08
- Re: SPF @ AOL --- record may flicker, John Capo, 2004/01/09
- Re: SPF @ AOL --- record may flicker, Kenneth Porter, 2004/01/09
- Forwarders, seph, 2004/01/09
- Re: Forwarders, wayne, 2004/01/09
- Re: Forwarders, Greg Connor, 2004/01/10
- Re: Forwarders, Phil Howard, 2004/01/11
- Re: Forwarders, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/11
- Re: Forwarders, Dr. Ernst Molitor, 2004/01/11
- Re: Forwarders, spf, 2004/01/11
- Re: Forwarders, Dr. Ernst Molitor, 2004/01/12
- Re: Forwarders, Phil Howard, 2004/01/12
- Re: Forwarders, wayne, 2004/01/11
- Re: Forwarders, Dr. Ernst Molitor, 2004/01/12
- RE: Forwarders, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/12
- Re: RE: Forwarders, Rik van Riel, 2004/01/12
- Re: RE: Forwarders, Dr. Ernst Molitor, 2004/01/12
- Re: RE: Forwarders, R. Scott Perry, 2004/01/12
- Re: RE: Forwarders, Dr. Ernst Molitor, 2004/01/12
- Re: RE: Forwarders, R. Scott Perry, 2004/01/12
- Re: RE: Forwarders, wayne, 2004/01/12
- RE: Forwarders, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/12
- RE: Forwarders, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/12
- Re: RE: Forwarders, Dr. Ernst Molitor, 2004/01/12
- RE: Forwarders, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/12
- Re: RE: Forwarders, Phil Howard, 2004/01/12
- Re: RE: Forwarders, Kelson Vibber, 2004/01/12
- Re: RE: Forwarders, Phil Howard, 2004/01/12
- Re: RE: Forwarders, Alain Knaff, 2004/01/12
- Re: RE: Forwarders, Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/13
- Re: RE: Forwarders, wayne, 2004/01/12
- Re: RE: Forwarders, R. Scott Perry, 2004/01/12
- Re: RE: Forwarders, Dr. Ernst Molitor, 2004/01/12
- Re: RE: Forwarders, R. Scott Perry, 2004/01/12
- Re: RE: Forwarders, wayne, 2004/01/12
- Re: RE: Forwarders, Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/12
- Re: RE: Forwarders, wayne, 2004/01/12
- OT: Spam traps (was: Forwarders), Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/12
- Re: OT: Spam traps (was: Forwarders), Spot The Dog, 2004/01/12
- Re: OT: Spam traps (was: Forwarders), Kelson Vibber, 2004/01/12
- RE: OT: Spam traps (was: Forwarders), Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/12
- RE: Forwarders, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/12
- Re: RE: Forwarders, Phil Howard, 2004/01/12
- how blacklisting will work in the future, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/12
- Re: how blacklisting will work in the future, wayne, 2004/01/12
- Re: how blacklisting will work in the future, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/12
- Re: how blacklisting will work in the future, Dr. Ernst Molitor, 2004/01/12
- Re: how blacklisting will work in the future, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/12
- Re: how blacklisting will work in the future, Dr. Ernst Molitor, 2004/01/13
- Re: how blacklisting will work in the future, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/13
- Re: how blacklisting will work in the future, Dr. Ernst Molitor, 2004/01/13
- Re: how blacklisting will work in the future, Thomas R. Stephenson, 2004/01/13
- Unsolicited bulk email discarded., Root, 2004/01/13
- Re: Unsolicited bulk email discarded., Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/13
- Re: Unsolicited bulk email discarded., Jason, 2004/01/13
- Re: Unsolicited bulk email discarded., Phil Howard, 2004/01/13
- Re: RE: Forwarders, Phil Howard, 2004/01/12
- Re: Forwarders, Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/11
- Re: Forwarders, tv+spf, 2004/01/11
- Re: Forwarders, Greg Connor, 2004/01/11
- Re: Forwarders, tv+spf, 2004/01/11
- Re: SPF @ AOL --- record may flicker, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/09
- RE: SPF @ AOL --- record may flicker, Marc Alaia, 2004/01/12
SPF Advocacy,
Marc Alaia,
2004/01/08
- Re: SPF Advocacy, John A. Martin, 2004/01/08
- RE: SPF advocacy, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/25
- Re: SPF advocacy, Carsten Kuckuk, 2004/01/26
- Re: SPF advocacy, ck, 2004/01/26
- Re: Fw: Re: SPF advocacy, Bill Landry, 2004/01/26
- RE: Re: SPF advocacy, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/27
- Re: SPF advocacy, ck, 2004/01/27
- RE: SPF advocacy, ck, 2004/01/27
SPF adoption: stats needed,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/01/08
- Re: SPF adoption: stats needed, Jason, 2004/01/08
- Re: SPF adoption: stats needed, John Capo, 2004/01/08
- Re: SPF adoption: stats needed, Bill Landry, 2004/01/08
- Re: SPF adoption: stats needed, David Saez, 2004/01/08
- Re: SPF adoption: stats needed, Kelson Vibber, 2004/01/08
- RE: SPF adoption: stats needed, Marc Alaia, 2004/01/08
SPF for Sendmail, without milter - preferably a ruleset,
Jason Buchanan,
2004/01/08
- Re: SPF for Sendmail, without milter - preferably a ruleset, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/08
- Re: SPF for Sendmail, without milter - preferably a ruleset, Philip Gladstone, 2004/01/08
- Re: SPF for Sendmail, without milter - preferably a ruleset, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/08
- Re: SPF for Sendmail, without milter - preferably a ruleset, Philip Gladstone, 2004/01/08
- Re: SPF for Sendmail, without milter - preferably a ruleset, Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/08
- Re: SPF for Sendmail, without milter - preferably a ruleset, wayne, 2004/01/08
- Re: SPF for Sendmail, without milter - preferably a ruleset, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/08
- Re: SPF for Sendmail, without milter - preferably a ruleset, Tim Gladding, 2004/01/08
- Re: SPF for Sendmail, without milter - preferably a ruleset, Richard Kay, 2004/01/08
- Re: SPF for Sendmail, without milter - preferably a ruleset, wayne, 2004/01/08
- Re: SPF for Sendmail, without milter - preferably a ruleset, Jonathan Steinert, 2004/01/12
- Re: SPF for Sendmail, without milter - preferably a ruleset, wayne, 2004/01/12
- Re: SPF for Sendmail, without milter - preferably a ruleset, Kelson Vibber, 2004/01/12
Comment on RFC draft, section 9.1,
Jim Ramsay,
2004/01/07
- Re: Comment on RFC draft, section 9.1, Philip Gladstone, 2004/01/07
- improving Received-SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/01/07
- Re: improving Received-SPF, Jim Ramsay, 2004/01/08
- Re: Re: improving Received-SPF, Philip Gladstone, 2004/01/08
- Re: improving Received-SPF, Jim Ramsay, 2004/01/08
- Re: Re: improving Received-SPF, Philip Gladstone, 2004/01/08
- Re: improving Received-SPF, Jim Ramsay, 2004/01/08
- RE: improving Received-SPF, Julian Mehnle, 2004/01/09
- Re: RE: improving Received-SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/01/09
- Offtopic: List archives a potential spam source?, spf-disc, 2004/01/09
- Re: improving Received-SPF, Jim Ramsay, 2004/01/09
- Re: Re: improving Received-SPF, R. Scott Perry, 2004/01/09
Great stuff,
Jim Ramsay,
2004/01/06
- Re: Great stuff, R. Scott Perry, 2004/01/06
- Re: Great stuff, wayne, 2004/01/06
- Re: Challenge-Response as fallback, Dan Boresjo, 2004/01/06
- Re: Great stuff, Jim Ramsay, 2004/01/06
- Re: Re: Great stuff, wayne, 2004/01/06
- Re: Re: Great stuff, Greg Connor, 2004/01/07
- Re: Re: Great stuff, Will Lowe, 2004/01/07
- Re: Re: Great stuff, Kenneth Porter, 2004/01/07
- Re: Re: Great stuff, John Capo, 2004/01/07
- Re: Great stuff, Jim Ramsay, 2004/01/07
- Re: Re: Great stuff, John Capo, 2004/01/07
- Re: Great stuff, seph, 2004/01/07
- Re: Re: Great stuff, Andreas Kreuzinger, 2004/01/08
- RE: Re: Great stuff, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/01/06
- RE: Re: Great stuff, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/01/06