On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 02:23:02PM -0500, Vivien M. wrote:
|
| That said, I don't really want to resuccitate this horse... But I have
| argued in the past (see the archives) and will argue again that there are
| many legitimate reasons why someone would need to use a
| non-domain-owner-provided SMTP server in cases where the domain owner's SMTP
| follows the old "relay for your local IPs" model. Such a domain owner could
| not, without severely inconveniencing some people (many of whom are at the
| bottom of the organizational food chain), deploy SPF without reconsidering
| how people in this "grey" zone use email.
|
Sure, and they can publish +all, or not publish at all.
SPF is a tradeoff. It's not mandatory.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
Wiki:
http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/HomePage
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡