spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SPF advocacy

2004-01-27 20:32:20
Thomas Harold (tgh(_at_)tgharold(_dot_)com) wrote:

The issue that I've seen is where a road-warrior is visiting another 
company's location, where they get a private IP address (10.x.x.x, 
192.168.x.x, etc.), and the firewall is such that only HTTP traffic is 
allowed to pass.  And even that traffic gets put through a proxy server, 
sometimes with a username/password becaues the company heavily monitors 
web usage.

Been there, done that....

So it does happen, generally the only choices are:

- sent via the internal SMTP server, changing addresses/reply-to enough 
to get the mail routed outbound (good idea to use PGP/GPG at this point)

- borrow somebody's fax line for a few minutes and dial-out to a public 
ISP, then VPN/SSH to the proper SMTP server back at your office

- use a web-mail package to check for any new mail back at the office

- go find a local public WiFi access point where you can "phone home"

- wait until you get back to the hotel in the afternoon/evening

- VPN over port 80 (e.g. with httptunnel[1])

[1] http://www.nocrew.org/software/httptunnel.html

-- 
Greg Wooledge                  |   "Truth belongs to everybody."
greg(_at_)wooledge(_dot_)org              |    - The Red Hot Chili Peppers
http://wooledge.org/~greg/     |

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
Wiki: 
http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/HomePage
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)½§ÅvÂ¼ð¦¾Øß´ëù1Ií-»Fqx(_dot_)com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>