Guillaume Filion [gfk(_at_)logidac(_dot_)com] wrote:
"Julian Mehnle" <lists(_at_)mehnle(_dot_)net> wrote:
So, what are the advantages of using "Received-SPF:" compared with
"Received: SPF"?
It's standards compliant. We should not get incompliant just to
accommodate broken programs, no way!
Check the RFCs (or http://cr.yp.to/immhf.html which is a bit more
readable). "Received: SPF" *is* standard compliant.
Where does it say that? On [1] it says the minimum "Received:" record would
contain:
7. a semicolon; and
8. a timestamp
"SPF" doesn't match any of the other things (1. through 6.).
[1] http://cr.yp.to/immhf/envelope.html
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.5.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)���v¼����ߴ��1I�-�Fqx(_dot_)com