spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: clamav plugin?

2004-01-30 19:55:36
Guillaume Filion [gfk(_at_)logidac(_dot_)com] wrote:
Le 04-01-30, à 19:09, Julian Mehnle a écrit :
"SPF" matches neither "a semicolon" nor "a timestamp", nor a
combination of both.  Neither does it match any of the items 1 to 6.
So how can it be valid AKA not forbidden?

Maybe I'm missing something, but I just don't get it.

"Received: SPF" was an abbreviation (or code name). Here's a complete
example of what I was proposing:

Received: SPF pass (mybox.example.org: domain of
                       myname(_at_)example(_dot_)com designates 192.0.2.1 as
                        permitted sender)
           receiver mybox.example.org client-ip 192.0.2.1
           envelope-from myname(_at_)example(_dot_)com; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 
19:27:05
             -0600

So, how do you generate this "Received:" header using the grammar given in RFC 
2821[1], section 4.4, page 52?

I hope we can finally end this discussion now.

[1] http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2821.txt

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.5.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)���v¼����ߴ��1I�-�Fqx(_dot_)com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>